Explore the What, Why, and How of Test Analysis with use case , challenges and best practices.
OVERVIEW
In the dynamic life cycle of software development, test analysis plays a pivotal role by ensuring the quality, reliability, and effectiveness of the software being developed. It is a crucial phase that occurs after the requirements gathering and before the software testing.
Test analysis is invaluable for various stakeholders involved in the software development process for Developers It provides clear and detailed test cases, aiding them in understanding the expected behavior of the software and assisting in debugging when defects are identified, For testers It guides them in executing tests accurately and efficiently, ensuring comprehensive coverage and reliable results and also for business analysts product owners and project managers. Testers or developers must first figure out some practical and reliable test case design techniques for improving the quality of the software testing process.
However, test analysis is not without difficulties; these include the difficulty of understanding complex requirements, ensuring that there is complete coverage, managing evolving project scope etc. To solve these issues and gather the test data various patterns or strategies have been followed. Let's understand !
The process of gathering, analyzing and examining test artifacts or test data to create test scenarios or test cases is known as test analysis. Test analysis aims to collect requirements and develop test objectives. As a result, it is also known as Test Basis and Test Foundation. Without test analysis, we might miss important problems in the software. It helps create strong tests that ensure the software works well.
Given its many uses, tes analysis is a crucial step in the evaluation of any process or system designed to measure performance, accuracy, or effectiveness. It involves a comprehensive examination of test results, methodologies, and variables to extract meaningful insights and ensure the validity and reliability of the testing process.
The depth of the test analysis depends on a number of context- and software-related variables. The following are some of the major variables that affect how in-depth a test analysis is:
It's important to note that finding the appropriate amount of detail in test analysis is a dynamic process that may change as the project moves along and new information becomes available, it's crucial to keep in mind. Successful test results depend on the planning and execution of the test being flexible and adaptable.
You can gather data through the V Model by aligning test activities with corresponding development phases, ensuring comprehensive coverage and validation at each step of the software lifecycle. Following a pattern will be more effective for collecting data and for project management.
The sources for acquiring test information are as follows:
A complete technical plan for developers is provided in the Detail Design Document (DDD), which is a thorough blueprint that interprets the system architecture and requirements. Both high-level and low-level design elements are included. The high-level design provides a summary of the principal modules, their interactions, and core functionalities that make up the system's structure. The system's architecture, database layout, and external interfaces are all described. The low-level design, on the other hand, goes into greater detail with each module, defining the interfaces, data structures, and algorithms needed for implementation. It contains class diagrams, sequence diagrams, and database schema specifics, giving developers a detailed insight to code effectively.
Performance testing is primarily concerned with assessing high level design system's reactivity, scalability, and stability under a range of workloads. It seeks to guarantee that the software operates at its best in demanding or stressful circumstances. Response times, resource use, and general system behavior are measured during this testing by replicating real-world usage scenarios.
Where on the other hand Unit Testing seems more suitable for low level design where individual units or components of a software application are tested in isolation. It validates whether each unit functions as expected and meets its design specifications. Developers write unit tests to ensure that their code functions correctly and reliably. These tests are typically automated tests and run frequently during the development process to catch and fix bugs early.
A software system's specific functionalities are described in detail in a functional design document (FDD). It offers a thorough explanation of how the system will satisfy the specified business requirements. Detailed functional requirements, process processes, user interfaces, and data models are frequently included in this document.
The foundation for comprehending the functionalities and interactions of the system is provided by the functional design documents. This data is used in integration testing to confirm that various components function properly together. Together, they make sure the program runs properly both on an individual level and when integrated into a larger system.
A comprehensive document that specifies the specific requirements and functions of a software system is called a software requirement specification (SRS). It functions as a contract between the client and the development team and offers a detailed road map for the software's design, development, and testing.
The SRS contains details on system architecture, user interfaces, functional and non-functional requirements, and more. Where System Testing ensures that the software actually performs as specified in the SRS. Together, they form a crucial link in the software development and testing process, ensuring that the final product aligns with the client's expectations and requirements.
The foundational document that specifies the precise requirements and expectations of a software project from a business viewpoint is known as Business Requirement Specification (BRS). It provides a clear development plan and distinguishes between functional and non-functional requirements.
On the other hand User Acceptance Testing (UAT) is the last stage of the testing procedure where end users confirm whether the system satisfies their unique needs and requirements. Prior to final implementation, this testing process is essential for ensuring that the program performs as planned in the real-world operational environment. The BRS serves as a guide for UAT because it is based on the business requirements described in that document. When UAT is completed successfully, the system is prepared for deployment.
Scenario:
An e-commerce company, "ShopEZ," has recently launched a new online shopping platform. The company wants to ensure that the shopping cart functionality is robust and user-friendly before the official launch.
User Actions:
Adding Items to the Cart:
User navigates to the product catalog, selects desired items, and adds them to the shopping cart.
Quantity Adjustment:
User reviews the cart, adjusts item quantities, and verifies that the cart reflects the changes accurately.
Removing Items:
User decides to remove certain items from the cart and checks if the cart updates accordingly.
Applying Coupons:
User has a discount coupon and applies it to the cart to ensure the discount is correctly calculated.
Viewing Subtotal and Total:
User checks the subtotal and total amount in the cart, confirming they are calculated accurately based on the selected items and quantities.
Proceeding to Checkout:
User initiates the checkout process, ensuring that the items in the cart are correctly transferred to the order summary.
Test Cases:
Boundary Testing for Quantity:
Verify that the system handles minimum and maximum quantity values correctly.
Coupon Validation:
Test the application with valid and invalid coupon codes to ensure correct application and rejection.
Concurrency Testing:
Simulate multiple users adding, adjusting, and removing items simultaneously to check for any conflicts or synchronization issues.
Ensure that the shopping cart functions consistently across different web browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, etc.).
Error Handling:
Test scenarios where unexpected errors occur (e.g., server timeout, network disconnect) to ensure the system provides appropriate error messages and handles such situations gracefully.
Performance Testing:
Simulate high loads and stress on the shopping cart functionality to assess its responsiveness and stability under heavy user traffic.
Mobile Responsiveness:
Verify that the shopping cart is user-friendly and functions seamlessly on various mobile devices.
Expected Outcomes:
All test scenarios should pass, demonstrating that the shopping cart functionality is reliable, user-friendly, and capable of handling different user interactions effectively. Any identified issues should be documented and addressed before the official platform launch.
Now, After becoming aware of the requirements, we gathered the test data and subsequently created test cases. Following this, we conducted test analysis to assess the effectiveness of the test cases and ensure they comprehensively cover the specified requirements. But exactly how we did it?
Make sure the testing team is aware of the project's goals, specifications, and the particular functionality being tested. Introduce them to testing techniques, equipment, and any applicable industry standards.
Identify essential user interactions with the online shopping cart, including activities like adding, modifying, and removing products, in collaboration with stakeholders. Create scenarios for border testing, coupon validation, concurrency, cross-browser support, error handling, performance, and responsiveness on mobile devices.
Creating test scenarios entails converting selected situations into detailed test cases that describe how to reproduce user activities. Prerequisites, input values, anticipated results, and any relevant post-actions (such as reviewing the cart, using coupons, and checking out) should be included for each scenario.
For each test scenario, identify a range of acceptable and unacceptable inputs. Invalid inputs, such as entering a negative number or using a coupon that has expired, should test the system's error handling and resilience while valid inputs ought to correspond to usual user behavior.
Ambiguous or Insufficient Requirements: Missing or ambiguous requirements might make it challenging to develop thorough test cases and scenarios, perhaps leaving gaps in test coverage.
To overcome these obstacles, careful planning, excellent communication, and frequently the use of suitable test tools and test estimation are required. Successful test analysis also requires a proactive strategy to recognize and address these issues.
Clear Requirement Understanding: Ensure that the test analysis is in line with the planned functionality and objectives by thoroughly understanding the project requirements.
By putting these best practices into practice, test analysis becomes more organized, efficient, and dependable, which eventually results in higher-quality software outputs.
In order to ensure the quality, dependability, and effectiveness of the program, test analysis is a crucial stage in the software development lifecycle. Teams can improve the effectiveness and accuracy of their testing efforts by adhering to best practices including having a clear grasp of the requirements, prioritizing test cases, and using data-driven testing. It's critical to overcome obstacles like unclear requirements and time limits, and applying strategies like regression testing and automation can help the testing process even more. In the end, thorough test analysis results in the creation of durable and dependable software systems.
Author's Profile
Bhawana
Bhawana, marketer in profession and a tech enthusiast at heart, embarks on a continuous learning journey in the realm of software testing. Recently joining Lamdatest, her passion for QA and software testing is evident in her work. With a keen interest in mastering the intricacies of testing methodologies, Bhawana is dedicated to honing her skills and achieving excellence in the ever-evolving tech landscape.
Reviewer's Profile
Harshit Paul
Harshit is currently the Director of Product Marketing at LambdaTest. His professional experience spans over 7 years, with more than 5 years of experience with LambdaTest as a product specialist and 2 years at Wipro Technologies as a certified Salesforce developer. During his career, he has been actively contributing blogs, webinars as a subject expert around Selenium, browser compatibility, automation testing, DevOps, continuous testing, and more.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!