hi jerry
I got your response. you obviously took the time to write it down for me and I appreciate it. there are a few things right out the top of my had I feel I must tell you. another reply from me may follow, but just so you know ( and please excuse any spelling errors and such - I am using my second language here )
Your English is quite good for a second language.
first of all my name. zohar in Hebrew means glow. it might have bean used in some religious Jewish context, but with me it's just glow- as my parents decided to name their 3 little kids with light related names, and me being the first. I am not a religious man, I don't believe in god ( I think people invented god to explain phenomenon they didn't have the ability to understand), so I don't know if that makes me a Jew in your view, but I am an Israeli, born and raised.
Well, ok then, here's the history of your name. Zohar was a mystical commentary on the Torah written (probably) by Moses de Leon in the 13th century. However, the Jews have always alleged the author to have been Simon ben Yohai, a 2nd century Jewish scholar and mystic. This is probably a false attribution. It is possible for a book to reappear, after having been lost for 1100 years, if was carefully preserved (such as in an atmosphere without oxygen), but it is not probable. Zohar is the second book of Cabalistic lore; the first book is Sefera Yezira, also appearing ca. 1200; it is also falsely attributed to the Patriarch Abraham himself, supposedly having been missing for 3,100 years. The Cabalistic movement began among the Jews in France in about 1100, or two hundred years prior to the "discovery" of these works of magical literature. By its practice and embellishment in Medieval Europe, the Cabala became the basis of the magical systems known best to Western Civilization.
The emergence of Cabalism is significant because the long-standing accusations, by gentiles against Jews, of practicing ritual murder in order to extract the victim's blood, began at about the same time. William of Norwich was murdered, allegedly by the Jews of Norwich, England, in 1144. He was certainly murdered by somebody. Anyway, the renewing of the Blood Accusation against the Jews happened at about the same time that Cabalism got started, after having been dormant for about a thousand years. (Most of the earlier accusations were in ancient times, among the Greeks, Romans, and Egyptians.)
my suspicions were right. what happened to you in 96 involved getting hurt by some people, some of them Jews, others friends with some Jewish people. along the way, after that experience, you developed some views, many of them not without assistance ( many of your views I think are things that you read in some places and agreed with ).
"Hurt" is too strong a word. I was outraged by patently invalid and unfair argumentative tactics engaged in by correspondents who, up to then, had seemed to be logical people. When suddenly they threw logic to the winds and ramped up a high-pressure and derogatory campaign against an opinion that I had ventured, I was surprised and somewhat angry. Although I didn't at first know the reason for the vitrol, I came to appreciate that many other Whites had similarly been defamed after having recognized something about Israel, or about the Jews, that the Jews did not want talked about. At least my opponents could not take away my job, as I did not work for MSN. But others have lost jobs or offices, simply for telling the truth.
I suspect that some of these defamers belong to a Jewish organization called the Anti-Defamation League, an organization that pretends to represent civil rights, but really protects Israel from criticism by attacking critics. Because you are a Jew living in Israel, you are free to criticise your country; but you don't know the situation over here. The ADL is also a big problem for us because it corrupts our government and our police with propaganda that basically says that Whites are suspicious, but Jews are innocent, and even the White policemen are starting to be persuaded of this nonsense.
you seem to think that Jews have a collective set of mind, that Jews are like the borg in star treck, that Jews devote their lives to take over the world or something ( is USA the world? ), and win some kind of a contest over the white race ( what is the white race? )...
Nope, I don't think that. That's a good example of the simplistic summary of the antisemitic view that I hear, over and again, from Jews who want to trivialize their critics. Jews aren't like the Borg to the extreme that the Borg were like the Borg. However, the comparison isn't completely without merit; if it were entirely inappropriate as a comparison, then I would not have thought of it before you wrote me.
But instead of comparing the Borg to the Jews as a whole people, compare them instead to organized Jewry, the system of rich networking Jews who, among other things, pushed Adolf Hitler into a choice between famine and war in 1939 with a boycott that they started in 1933. These powerful Jews don't share a "mind-link" the way the science fiction Borg do, but they have telephones and addresses, and they stay in touch with each other. Jews are 2-3 percent of the US population, but regardless of the small percentage, the largest segment of the registered ethnic associations of some large American cities are Jewish. It is reasonable to suppose that this Jewish penchant for organization is carried over to political agendas, and with a little thinking it becomes obvious that those who lightly pooh-pooh the notion of "Jewish conspiracies" are either ignorant or dishonest.
There are such things as forests and crowds. Any time you contemplate an animal larger than a protozoa, you don't ordinarily restrict your attention to the individual functions of each of its cells and forbid yourself from noticing the behavior of the animal as an organism. Likewise, you can just as well consider the behavior of a people, a tribe, a nation as a whole, and not merely as an aggregation of individual activities. Atoms make molecules, and molecules have a molecular nature that is additional to the nature of the component atoms. Molecules make cells, and cells have a cellular nature that is additional to the nature of the component molecules. Cells make people, and people have an personal nature that is additional to the nature of the component cells.
Don't stop here; continue—there is no good reason for stopping. People form into groups that are both natural (evolutionary) and political (consciously created). In particular, people make races, and races have a racial nature that is additional to the nature of the component persons. You can go even further, of course. Races make species, and species have a nature that is additional to the nature of the component races. And species make up all living things, and life has qualities in distinction with non-life that are not exclusively the property of any single species. And matter is distinguished from energy in ways having nothing to do with life. And existence differs...
There is a logical flaw at this point, since existence by definition has nothing to which is can differ. What does not exist is not available for use as a comparison.
But while we were moving toward higher generalities, we skipped a point. Just as some individuals are competitors to others, and just as some species regard others as food, so also is there competition and struggle among races. The competition is naturally regulated by geograpical segregation; and the conflict between races intensifies when that segregation breaks down. Nobody would hate Jews, if everyone were beyond the reach of Jews. Antisemitism isn't unnatural; quite the contrary—it is a defense reaction to the outward aggression of Zionism (which has always been a complementary opposite to the nationalist part of Zionism). Antisemitism is an inevitable defense reaction; it will always happen when Jews push gentiles too far. The nationalist part of Zionism is an answer to the problem of antisemitism because made a segregation of the Jews from others. But if Israel is not really the home of the Jews, but more like an international headquarters from which Jews peddle a corrosive influence in other people's countries, then the nationalism does not achieve its purpose, and antisemitism will again be the result.
The White race is a collection of related tribes. Broadly, the White race is subdivided into three subraces—the Nordic, the Alpine, and the Mediterranean. The tribal division already mentioned is a further division below those subraces, and they include the Teutonic, the Slavonic, the Baltic, the Celtic, among others. One of the more amusing things to notice about Jews is the way in which they recognize tribal distinctions in every race except the White race and promote the celebration of every culture except the Aryan one. It is an indication that a long-standing animosity, perhaps 3500 years old, still exists between the Aryan peoples and certain groups heir to the Semitic traditions.
It is possible that you are partly White by race. You might even have White racial instincts submerged beneath a conscious loyalty to the Jewish tribe. Time may determine whether this is so. The Jewish people are also a collection of tribes, rather than a single tribe, but there is a distinct strain of Khazar among the Ashkenazim, which strain is in turn a blend of Persian and Turk, with the latter predominating. Today, the Ashkenazim comprise the predominant "race" of Jew. All of the other races among the Jews, put together, are fewer in number worldwide. It has become customary to identify the Ashkenazim as "the Jewish race," and it is this race to which Hitler was referring when he spoke of the Jews as a race.
...you seem to think that it's in our genes or something ( most of my gene pool is polish ). so when you start to say things like jew invented that, jew did that thing to harm those guys, what exactly do you mean? does that sound to you as a logical thing to say?
Biologically, the subraces of the White race have more in common—are more closely related—than those of the Jewish people. This relatedness has been the subject of a well-known anthropological survey called "The History and Geography of Human Genes" by Cavalli Sforza. On a genetic scale, using the gene markers that this geneticist used, the White tribes of Europe can be found within a cluster about 200 units wide, and this is sufficient to include even the outlying, "suburb" tribes into the White race...such as the Iranians. When you narrow the field down to 100 units, you still contain most of the European tribes, with the Belgians being most central, and with the Germans having the next smallest sum of genetic distance to all of the other White tribes. You can improve the focus a bit and recognize Germanic, Romance, Celtic and Slavonic clusters within the main White race cluster; these sub-clusters are usually around 20 units wide. But you don't need to take my word for it. "The History and Geography of Human Genes" was published by the Princeton University Press, and the numbers that I've been using can be found in two tables in that book (I don't have it in front of me so I can't tell you the page numbers).
By comparison, the Turks are 800 units from the White racial cluster—they are "not white" even if they have fair skin. (That is a good illustration that race is not skin color.) The Chinese are about 1000 units from the White race. The Blacks of Africa are about 2000-2500 units from the White race, depending on which Black group you choose. Since the Khazars were mostly Turk with some Iranian mixture, they were probably around 600 units distant from the White race.
Jews invented feminism? is feminism a thing to be invented? jews invented marxism? Marx was jewish ( I think ) but he sure had a mind of his own, and he was full of good intentions ( though somewhat naive )...
Yes indeed, feminism was invented, at least in its dysfunctional modern form. Before feminism, White people had a culture in which women became mothers, had babies, raised children, and saw to the administration of the hearth and home. If you had asked most of them how they regarded their lives, they'd have told you that they were happy and satisfied with their traditional roles. Was this arrangement "fair" to women? That's the wrong question to ask. The important thing is: it worked. While we had a patriarchal society, our race was vigorous, and we were a strong people. Feminism might have given more choices to women, but it weakened the race as a whole, and it reduced the happiness of women. Feminism is "gender Marxism," and like all kinds of Marxism, its drawbacks are worse than its advantages. Feminism gave men and women conflicting interests; they were no longer teammates, but competitors belonging to opposing teams. The quality of life became worse for both sexes as the result of feminism; that is, as the result of Jewish meddling in a White culture ostensibly for the sake of "fairness," but in reality to demoralize and to weaken the family bonds of the host people.
Your question implies that the changes in traditional Western culture that the Jews have made are some kind of "standard" to which departures are in need of "justification." That is a false belief. Our old culture was better for us, generally speaking, than the one that your people have had a large part in creating. America was a better place in 1900 than it was in 2000, despite the invention of technology during the 20th century. Human genetic quality is most important; cultural fitness is next; and the comforts of civilization, such as electricity and washing machines, are of much less importance. Given its predecessor, the successor will tend to follow, unless a strong disturbing force interferes.
And I don't think that Karl Marx had good intentions. Yes, he was Jewish, and the grandson of a rabbi. He wrote, though I forget to whom, that communism would deliver gentile nations into the hands of the Jews.
Jewish communities all over the world are an ethnic minority. in Europe in past centuries, most human beings ( except maybe clergyman and some rich guys) could not even read, let alone do their math. they were, relative to today, very simple minded. the church was running their lives, and to give them all a sense of unity , gave them something to hate - in the form of the jews ( it was very easy- they said ' the jews killed jesus', disregarding the fact that jesus was jewish and the roman empire was the one that controlled the place, and killed him because the feared he will rebel the empire as new jewish leader ). in most places in Europe jews were not allowed to own a land. they were persecuted everywhere they went, and many times forced to migrate from place to place...
At this point, I should remind you that the Jews produced Christianity originally. Jesus himself was probably a Jew, though it is not absolutely certain. But after Jesus' death, the doctrine and early political form of the Christian church was determined by Jews, such as Saulus (Paul) of Tarsus, who was but should not have been a Roman citizen. Most Christian sects today are Pauline sects, having at least as much to do with the doctrines of Paul as with the ideas of Jesus. The dominating ways of the Medieval Church, including its manner of subjugating the human spirit, are consequences of this early Judaization of the church's fundamental doctrines. The anti-Jewish persecutions that happened later, to the extent that they did not have economic motives, were the result of gentiles taking possession of the church—while continuing to practice the long-established warfare against groups who were judged heretical. Once the Jews were thrown out of power in the Church, the ideological weapon that they had crafted was turned against them, and it remained so for about 15 centuries. The lesson that the Jews should have learned from this is: Don't meddle in the cultures of gentiles. But meddling seems to be an organic part of being Jewish, and so the lesson has not yet been learned.
Nonetheless, the Jews' weapon had its effect also on the White peoples. Whereas before Christianity, the Aryan race had gloried in its own nature, it afterward learned to be ashamed. The individual spirit was crushed by threat, by torture, by murder, and by a pervasive and hushed sense of gloom that was sanctified as "holiness." The light of Classical culture vanished from Europe, not to reappear until the Renaissance, and in its place was the deadness of a religious doctrine that most did not dare to question. Christianity was invented by Jews but escaped from their control; it crushed the White race under its weight for about as long as it persecuted Jews—except that the Whites suffered more constantly, if usually less acutely. That is, Jews suffered greatly, but only episodically. Whites suffered the oppression all the time and called it their way of life. But remember that it was your people who built this theocratic edifice and inflicted it on us; left alone, the White peoples would never have created such a monstrosity. If the Jews sometimes got hit with backlash from this religion, then it is ridiculous for them to complain about it. If you don't want to get hit, don't meddle...the lesson is repeated until it is learned.
...the result- the average jew was cleverer, could speak more then one language, thus be a better trader. not surprisingly many of them chose to deal with occupations that involved money, traders, and then bankers and such. and nobody likes bankers, especially if they become much richer then you. add to that the fact that the jewish way of praying ( in hebrew! ) sounded to most people like witch craft- and there you have it- jews must be the devil !! maybe that explains to you why jews were hated 'everywhere' as you say.
How is it that a truth can be put right in front of a Jew, but he cannot correctly describe its shape, or its color, or its size? A difference in language is not itself a plausible explanation for the intensity and ubiquity of antisemitism. The silliness of the idea can be seen when one considers that Jews aren't the only group with a foreign language, but they are the only group with a three-thousand-year-long whine of "oppression" and "persecution." The Jews were hated almost everywhere. They were hated in Ukraine. Are we then to blame the Ukrainians? They were hated in Germany. Are we then to blame the Germans? They were hated in Spain. Are we then to blame the Spanish? They were hated in England. Are we then to blame the English? They were hated in Italy. Are we then to blame the Italians? And now they are hated by the Arabs. Are we now to blame the Arabs? The Jews certainly want the Arabs to bear the blame—but should they? The very fact that the Jews always provoke hostility from gentile nations, no matter which, no matter where, no matter when, does not give any moral argument to the Jews against the gentiles. Rather, it gives to the gentiles a moral argument against the Jews. In this, the German, the Russian and the Arab can all agree.
About those Jewish bankers, then. The money system of the European countries was, originally, based on wealth already produced and on value that was already in existence. It was "published" to the people, put into circulation, by the King as "coin of the realm." But during the Middle Ages, Jewish goldsmiths began to issue promissory notes in amounts exceeding the amount of gold that they really had in their deposit boxes. Because gold is heavy, and paper is much easier to carry, these promissory notes became substitutes for the actual gold. The Jews thus created the first paper debt-money. And it was a cheat. The goldsmith charged interest for his fraudulent loans, which the borrower had to repay by doing a lot of hard work. The Jew then became a swindler and a counterfeiter who had found a way to steal the benefit of work done by other people. And, most of the time, it worked. The Jew was not caught often enough, or punished severely enough, to stop his swindle from making him rich, and then richer, and then so rich that he became a threat to the very kings and nobles who had benefited from the money-scam in the beginning. The goldsmith gave way to the Jewish banking house, and the governments of the European countries were hanging by a thread held in the hands of Anselm Rothschild during the 18th century. Your people's control of my people's governments is the cause of great hostility from us toward you, now that we are becoming aware of the deception that the Jews practiced in order to get their power.
...and jews where indeed hated everywhere, and that's why many jews decided to form a place where they will not be the minority any longer, a jewish state. for religious reasons they chose this place ( personally I wish they hadn't ), and that's what you call zionism. most of the jews didn't join this movement, it was mostly young jews from eastern europe, and not a bit percentage of them, that came here in the first place. when things in europe started to get harsh with the first world war many more migrated here, using the infrastructure that was already set for them, and those that decided not to come, well some of them got killed buy the Nazis, the rest got split- some to Israel, more to America, and few stayed where they were. and that's what Zionism was. of course the Arabs that live in this country didn't like the idea- masses of European types coming over and filling the land, started clashing with the Jews, the Jews who now built a new sense of pride striked back and defended themselves, not always in the right way, and that was the start of the Arab Israeli conflict.
I am amused by your posturing the Jews as being "on the defensive" when they were, in fact, dispossessing the Palestinians of their land with the help of British soldiers and, later, with the help of American weapons and money. The notion of Jews "striking back and defending themselves" is to laugh at. The Arabs were on the land; your people drove them off of it, and the Jews killed the Arabs who did not run fast enough. That is how the facts really are. There is hardly one Jewish town in Israel that was not built on top of an earlier Arab town. This is not defense; it is aggression. In fact, it is a military conquest of the same type as the Nazis attempted. Whites have noticed for a long time that the Jews often use the words "defense" and "aggression" in a backwards way. It makes us suspect that you might be dishonest in respect to other things also.
Your conflict in the Mid-East should be a matter for your people and the Arabs to settle between yourselves, and we Americans should have no interest in whichever of you won the contest. Unfortunately, Israel uses America as a source of war technology and money. The media companies in the United States are mostly owned by Jews who distort and falsify the conflict over there. (I belong to an organization that studies Israel, and we can read and hear what you say among yourselves and are not deceived by the propaganda that has been fooling other Americans for a long time.) Your country is making enemies for my people that we simply do not want to have. Your fight is not our fight, and you dirty our reputation in the world by dragging us into it. Your conquest or your defeat does not matter to us in the slightest, except insofar as you inflict the consequences of your wars on us.
Those consequences will gradually turn Americans against you. By deception, Israel has brought America this far down the path toward world-hatred. But Americans are becoming aware, and a practical consideration of your future circumstances would suggest that the thing for you to do is stop meddling with us. Were the Nazis not example enough for you? Your people escaped that time because the Americans and the British were tricked into fighting for you, and the Russians were slaves who had been tricked. That salvation will not be available to the Jews the next time the reprisals come.
But there is a moral issue also. The Jews sometimes point out, to justify their aggression, that America was also the prize of conquest. Whites killed the Indians and took their land, just as the Jews are killing the Arabs and taking their land, so, the Jews say, the Whites cannot afford to condemn the Jewish conquest of Palestine.
And that is correct. Even if it were not for this correspondence of history, we could not condemn conquest, since conquest is the way of nature.
But let's continue with the comparison. America was founded by Whites. (The Blacks were slaves, non-citizens, imported for labor, and mostly brought here on ships owned by Jews in London and in Amsterdam. America was not founded as a homeland for Blacks, but only for Whites.) The Whites came to America to secure freedom from oppression in Europe, and often the freedom that they were seeking was religious freedom. The comparison of America to the Jews and to Israel is still a good comparison.
America was to be the Zion of the White people. So why are the Jews over here messing up our Zion? There are more Jews in America than in Israel. You would not want Nazis in Israel telling the Jews how to live, what they must eat, what behavior and opinions were acceptable, and which laws to live by. You would not want Nazis in Israel demanding that the Knesset send three billion shekels a year to America. So why are the Jews doing those things here? You Jews don't want to play nice or what?
Whites didn't need the Jews to beat the Indians; so why do you need our money and our technology and our soldiers to help you beat the Arabs? And it is nothing to us if you simply can't exist without our help. To us, you're a tick in the ear. Your need for blood doesn't make us want to get bitten.
...but now when I look around I see a normal country, and jews here are not like the jews you describe. not all of them are in the media, and not all of them are dealing with money- otherwise we wouldn't have a state. there are farmer types, army types, pervert and criminal types, politician types, racist types, teacher types, religious and secular types, all sorts of Jew's like any normal place would develop. we have our share of unemployment, social gaps, political debates. and looking around me seeing all this and being a part of it myself, hearing things like Jews invented that and Jews did that sounds highly irrational. I don't know 2 Jewish people who think alike, as no 2 humans ever think alike. and all I try to do while living here is to live my normal life wish my lovely wife.
You're certainly free, or should be free, to have a normal family life—at your own expense. The Jews should be as free as anyone else to have a national homeland—at their own expense. It is when they involve others that their moral right comes into question.
Your country has received from mine over 100 billion dollars to "make peace." Instead, you have ensured a continuation of war, and you have provoked the whole Moslem world, some one billion people, to a hatred for my country. You have cost us tremendously, and we are bitter about our losses.
You are a burden we do not want to carry, and we resent that your political organizations have more influence on our government than we do ourselves. We resent that most of us have no reliable means of learning the truth about the world that isn't filtered and censored by Jews. We will, in time, overcome these limitations, and when we do, we might have a bill to present to Israel for payment, either in reparations or in blood.
And we know more about Israel than you seem to think. We know about the international prostitution business that is run by Jewish criminals and based in your country. We know that the main victims of this crime enterprise are White women—my kinswomen—from Russia and Ukraine and East Europe. For that alone, I could wish the complete destruction of Israel. How dare your people touch my race's women!
If the Arabs get nuclear weapons and destroy your country someday, I'll laugh and say, "That's what those Jews get for enslaving White women; it serves them right." Before you say that my opinion is "too extreme," imagine how you'd feel if you found out that America was harboring White racists who were kidnapping Jewish women and forcing them to be prostitutes, and beating them if they did not do this job satisfactorily, and sometimes even killing them to show the other Jewesses what happens to "troublemakers."
Well? Would you not hate us for that? Of course you would, and you'd be right to hate those who harmed your women. And yet do you imagine that other races will make exception for Jews, when they practice this kind of exploitation?
what I think you came across in 96 was some kind of defense mechanism the people you confronted had. you have the tendency to generalize things you say and I suspect you may have been a little insensitive, someone got hurt for some reason from something you said and that came back at you, and you were banned. the same thing happened to me in highschool. during a political debate I told the one I was arguing with that he was immature. he was very popular and he was deeply offended, and I was persecuted by him and his friends for the rest of the year. I will always hate that guy, but why should I hate his family? did his brother ever do something to me?
There are Jews who are not personally guilty of harming Whites. That is of course true. But (as the Jews themselves loudly pointed out at Nuremberg), a nation is responsible for the actions of its leaders. When the Arabs punish us for supporting your country's militarism, they have some justification.
But, likewise, we Americans have the same justification when we blame you, you Zohar, personally, for the acts of your leaders, both in the official world of Israeli politics, as well as in the world of the international Jewish crime syndicates. (By the way, we are not deceived by the media's insisting on calling them "Russians." They are Jews who rule these crime organizations; some of them just happen to live in Russia.) If you don't like being blamed, then you may work to change your government through your political process there, and then punish the Jewish criminals who plague us.
If these things are not done, then sooner or later another power will arise to do what you and the other "innocent" Jews would not do. But if that happens, then these "innocent" Jews will also become victims.
I think I have many more things to tell you but I don't even know where to begin the rest of it. I think you should lower your shields some. maybe by talking to be that's exactly what you are doing ? just note that all over the world every political movement and religious movement tend to think that they are the good guys and the others are the bad guys. even usama bin laden is convinced that he is doing good and he will go to heaven ( and how ridiculous is that? ). the truth is that there are no good guys and bad guys. many people and many peoples try to do good and end up doing not so good. America is doing good by chasing bin laden but some good people get killed in the process, some American soldiers, some afghans. there is a saying - the rode to hell is filled with good intensions.
Osama bin Laden is an Islamic militant who believes that God has called him to fight for the freedom of Arab peoples, including the Palestinians, from Zionism. By his standards, he is doing exactly what would earn him a place in heaven. And it is by his own standards that we can best understand why he behaves as he does. Judging him otherwise only invites confusion. We can fight him as an enemy without putting bad-smelling names on him; we can fight him even though we understand his motives as he understands them himself. That is, anyway, the White way to fight; it is Jews who insist on making a demon out of a foe.
"Good guys" and "Bad guys" was a meaningless abstraction from the beginning. Good and bad have no meaning, except that they are referred to a purpose. Good for what, or for whom? Bad for what, or for whom? What is good for me might be bad for you. What is good for Israel might be bad for America. Osama bin Laden is doing what he thinks is good for Arab Moslems, and certainly many Arab Moslems agree with him as they sing his praises and make a saint out of him and buy bubblegum that has his picture on the wrapper.
But in the long run, it does not matter whether the United States catches Osama bin Laden or not. Terrorism has come to the United States, mostly because of Israel. It will continue to happen; when one terrorist is caught, two more will arise in his place. There will be more terrorism here, and it will only get worse with time. Will the first terrorist nuclear bomb blow up a city in Israel, or a city in America? It is hard to tell. But this will happen one day. And when it does happen, it will be the Jews who caused it to happen, when your people found themselves without land but chose neither to assimilate with another national group, nor to all of you go live in the country that you conquered, but instead preferred a "Zionism" by which you continued to corrupt and to threaten other countries.
my first instinct after glancing at your site was to ignore you' but I decided not to. I think that's what got you to where you are in the first place- Jewish people find out who you are and fear takes over. talking to you in the mud I typed with shaking hands. somewhere deep down you scare me, and people like you scare me, and that's a feeling I can't control - after all you worship people that wished me dead. but as a one that believes people are basically good, I couldn't let it go. plus you are obviously highly intelligent, so I decided to get over myself and try to understand what makes you tick. any other guy would send you viruses, and try to tell all of newmoon who you are in the chat channel. but that's exactly how wars start - ignorance turns to fear that turns to hate that turns to aggression that turns to revenge and turns to counter revenge and war breaks. I think intelligent people should learn to overcome their primitive survival instincts. and the most primitive instinct is 'I wish every one was like me'.
Most of New Moon already know that I'm an American National Socialist. Some of the newer players might not know it, since I have kept my promise not to discuss my politics or to mention my website (biased censorship though that is). I'm a member of the National Alliance, and my organization has members in many countries (though most are in the United States). Our main office is in West Virginia. Our leader is Dr. William Pierce, a former physics professor at the University of Colorado.
I am not charged with prosecuting any vendetta against the Jewish people, and my website is to educate Whites so that they can protect themselves from the aggression of those who harm my race. So don't worry about computer viruses or any other kind of attack from me; I'm not a terrorist, just a White racist with a website who knows a bit more about racial struggles than most Whites know.
In some ways, Jews like you and Whites like me are the same: we both want our peoples to be safe from hostile outsiders. But there are differences, too, and one of those differences is that your people use mine as a resource and as a shield, thereby dragging us into your troubles. We would not do this to you, if our positions were reversed.
The Jews have too many of the crafty types of people who do not, or who will not, recognize that exploiting another people always produces a strong backlash after a while. The success of Zionist political lobbies in America at getting the US Government to give Israel billions of our dollars every year looks like a good deal...until you realize that every dollar will be paid for, someday, in one way or another.
I don't know why you are so surprised that I found your site? you say the title in your mud site - all that's left is to open a search engine ( google ) and type the title and the I'm feeling lucky button. it takes seconds. also about the mud. I am convinced that email is the better way to communicate so you don't get banned from newmoon. I am willing to respect that. you can remove my name from your ignore list, and I will not bother you with stuff other then mud related. if you decide to leave your shields up I can understand. zohar zaltz
Ok, you must have a fast connection then.
Jerry Abbott