The White race has become the only race for which a subjective, gut-level preference for their own sort is NOT sufficient reason to work for group advantages. Most Whites demand objective, scientific reasons for why they should not treat everyone as an individual. One answer, of course, is that the other races don't share this peculiar mindset, and that the Whites who think this way are putting themselves, their children, their grandchildren and all future descendants of theirs at a great disadvantage relative to races who subjectively value their own kind just because it is their own kind.

The condition is a disease, whether or not the affected recognize it. It works its harm by convincing people, usually Whites, that Nature's laws pertaining to competitive struggle don't apply to them, that they are somehow free to stand aloof and observe, somehow entitled to issue advice and admonishments to those who don't share their lofty, objective station. All the while, of course, their high ground is being cut away by the struggles of their racial competitors, but by the time the danger becomes so obvious that it must be faced, it is often too late to save them from being overwhelmed, conquered, dispossessed, massacred, and replaced.

White people, in particular, have an expectation of fairplay whose justification long ago evaporated. The racial struggles in America, as well as in a large part of Europe, can be compared with a sporting contest that White people have begun losing because they are failing to produce teams for the competitions. They've been persuaded that racial competition is evil, and that this competition will go away if they, themselves, refrain from engaging in it. That is the essential error of the White attitude.

Most Whites are persuaded that their own calling is to be an umpire or a referee, and to show their fairness by calling fouls against any White who strays on to the playing field wearing a jersey. The foolishness of that attitude is obvious when it is described without equivocation. But, unfortunately, there is much equivocation.

A very sly competitor has bought its way into the sportscaster's booth, setting itself up as a judge over the "fairness" of these White referees. It praises them as "fair" when they call fouls against the White players. It condemns them as "unfair" (i.e., as racists) when they support the cause of a White player, regardless of the merits of that cause. That's why, for example, White jurors won't dig in their heels during sequestration when Black jurors want to convict a White unjustly or when Black jurors want to set a Black thief or murderer free on specious grounds.

The immediate result is that it has become very difficult for these White referees to be truly fair, lest they be falsely accused by the Jewish news commentators as being partisan. It is much easier for them to be biased against their home team, since that will bring them praise from the Jews as being exemplars of fairplay.

And the next result, naturally, is that few Whites are willing to engage the opposing teams in actual play, and so the Blacks, the Mestizos, and every other colored team are racking up points unopposed by any effective White playing.

Until about 100 years ago, Whites reigned as World Champions in these racial contests through superb teamwork and energetic game play. But between then and now White people have come to believe that it is immoral to compete so well, to use their strength so "unfairly." Further, they've been made to think that there is something wrong with the kind of social organization that produces efficient teams. Where every other strategy had failed, Jewish media brainwashing succeeded. Whites are now ashamed of having been superior competitors, and they no longer organize their powers under their racial banner. They've entered a long slump in which they've been losing nearly every contest, and during this slump, race-treason became institutionalized and established as law.

The competition is more serious than a sporting contest, of course. I made that comparison to illuminate the struggle, not to make light of it. The notion that "it takes two to fight" is wrong. It takes two sides to ARGUE, but only the will of one to FIGHT. Racial competition isn't an argument. It is a fight. So long as there is a single group minded to engage in it, and there always will be, the struggle will exist. No one can ignore this reality except at the peril of defeat—and extinction.