What's wrong? We have lawyers who intentionally leave their best efforts in the courtroom undone. We have lawyers who betray their clients with conspiracies in return for political favors. We have lawyers who secure tangible benefits by regulating access to their jailed clients in ways sometimes hostile to the clients' interests. We have lawyers who take money from clients to do simple filing tasks, and then don't do them. We have lawyers who demand to be paid twice to do the same task once. We have lawyers who, from hidden motives of ethnic or racial hostility, seek out clients whom they have every intention of betraying later.
We have doctors who intentionally leave their best work in their offices or at the hospital undone. We have doctors who regard patients as cultures for disease germs, and those germs as cash crops. We have doctors who, for the sake of making the patient return again and again and again for treatments, intentionally fail to cure when curing is in their power, but rather authorize the patient to find temporary relief from his symptoms by buying a carefully measured supply of expensive chemicals from the pharmacy.
We have police officers who plant fake evidence on those whom they want to arrest. We have police officers who maliciously contrive confrontations with civilians, so that they can enjoy beating them up. We have police officers who steal. We have police officers who won't come to the aid of citizens threatened by rioters. We have police officers who set up normally honest people with temptations to break the law that would never ordinarily occur to them. We have police officers who give false testimony in courtrooms in order to cover for the bad behavior of other cops.
We have judges who use their offices to wage war against political dissidents. We have judges who favor one or another opposing side in their courtrooms on the basis of their potential for supplying contributions to an election campaign later. We have judges who knowingly sign backdated warrants to "authorize" illegal searches or seizures ex post facto. We have judges who make up bogus "legal theories" to justify denying persons their rights under US laws. We have judges who invent presumptuous interpretations of the Constitution to give the government powers or immunities that the men who designed the Constitution never intended that the government should have.
We have public officials whose chief motivation is to have a good political career. The country can go to the devil, as long as they, themselves, can keep their jobs, their pay and privileges, a high rating in the polls, and a good public image. Many are the evils that branch from this one, whose roots are the inherent defectiveness of mass democracy.
We have had a long parade of traitors in successive possession of our national executive authority. We have had presidents who not only forgive invaders for invading, but reward them for coming here illegally, and on top of that restrict legitimate citizens from taking effective measures to safeguard their property from them. We have had presidents whose real allegiance is to Israel, and not to the United States. We have had presidents who, because their real allegiance is to Israel, waged war on behalf of Israel against countries with which the United States would otherwise have had no quarrel. We have had presidents who have authorized law-enforcement measures that have resulted in the murder of a large number of Americans.
We have a non-ratified, non-legitimate constitutional Amendment to our national Constitution, namely the Fourteenth, that has been fraudulently accredited with enforcibility for more than a hundred years, with a whole galaxy of augmentory and pursuant laws depending from it to subjugate the real constitutional rights of the actual citizenry.
To summarize all of the foregoing: We have a rogue government. Our legitimate national government was dismantled by Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln wanted to trade a Federation of sovereign states tolerant of slavery for a racially homogeneous Union: a Zion for White people. But he was assassinated before he could carry out Phase 2 of his plan. The Jews evidently had much to do with the timing of Lincoln's assassination, as John Wilkes Booth seems to have been in contact with Rothschild agents. Soon after Lincoln died, the conspiracy to subjugate America went into high gear, saddling us with the 14th Amendment, then the Federal Reserve, and a U.S. government that is openly contemptuous of the interest and welfare of the American people. Again and again, it has sent Americans into needless wars that it started over false pretexts. Here at home, it has sent its agents to kill American civilians, in their churches, in their homes, and elsewhere. It extorts half our incomes from us by threats of imprisonment.
An outright military dictatorship can hardly be worse than this.
And one would be, at least, "outright"—right out in the open with no false pretensions about its goals and methods. There would be more honesty, and possibly less corruption (it depends on who the dictator is) than in our media corrupted democracy.
In every country with an oppressive government, you'll find scads of petty traitors whose treason consists primarily of "backing up" the regime in power, claiming it to be good and wise. Some of these petty traitors do this from fear that the government will attack them if they do not say positive things about it. Others are currying status or favor from that government. Still others are simply idiots who think that by saying what they "ought" to say, they are being "responsible" citizens. This is true in North Korea, where the idiots and petty traitors refer to Kim as "Our Dear Leader." It is true in China. When you find someone in a country with an oppressive government who does not bow down to the "Dear Leaders," you have found someone rare and special.
As strange as it might seem, most people might enjoy more real freedom—more choices in what they can do without restriction or exacting requirements for licensure—in a dictatorship than in our country presently. Again, it depends on who the dictator is. There's a world of difference between a Hitler and a Stalin, and we'd better understand why a Hitler is incomparably the better choice as an absolute leader.
Hitler could be ruthless toward individuals, but his aim wasn't his own aggrandizement or wealth. He really wanted the German people to become great again, and he was willing to break some eggs to make the national omelette. Stalin's aim was Stalin's power and Stalin's glory: whatever happened to the Russian people as the result was an acceptable sacrifice: they were the eggs, and HE was the omelette! That's the basic difference between Hitler and Stalin.
But the average voting citizen is an eternal sucker for a gussied-up liar with a silver tongue. The biggest obstacle to improving the lot of the public seems to be the public itself. If the decisions are left to them, they will not pull together, and the extent to which the United States has a coherent set of policies is the result of hidden Jewish control on the government. That control really ought to be in safer hands! Oddly, the problem with the voter does not seem to be an intelligence deficit. If he were being conned by a huckster selling damaged goods, he'd much more often spot the fraud and spare himself victimization. Let the same thing happen in an election, however, and he's a witless victim every time.
What makes the difference, then, if not intelligence? Partly, it's an unwarranted trust in the television media. The media bosses are as evil a bunch of lowlifes as they come, but they have money and they hire experts in psychology and public relations to eliminate all skepticism and make the "authoritativeness" of their presentations seem unimpeachable. The average citizen might be brainy enough to see through the fast-talk of an average con-man, but he's no match for all the professional opinion shaping power of the media.
For most of them, then, the only defense is to stop watching television. Unfortunately, TV viewing is a powerfully addictive habit, very similar to a narcotic drug in its effects, even though it travels through an electronic medium instead of a chemical one. Patterns of light and sound, infused with maliciously contrived meaning, enter the minds of the TV audience and have the same effect that would happen if everyone in the audience were taking some kind of weird psychiatric drug.
Just as taking the wrong drugs can make someone commit suicide, so can listening to too much Jew-controlled television make the voters think that they are choosing the right people and the right policies, when in fact they are choosing a course of self-destruction.
What's wrong with the United States? Before all of the other ills there stands this one: We have a media establishment controlled by Jews. Jews use their possession of the mass media to give the voters a standard of opinion that is irresistably easy to conform to. People like to be fashionable, and they like to be the first in their neighborhoods to know what the fashion is going to be, so that they can get themselves a reputation for being a fashion-leader. So they are very quick to conform to whatever destructive ideas the Jews hold out to them—to millions of them all at once—with television.
If there were any major television network in America being run by White nationalists, determined to present only racially progressive ideas and patriotic programming in their news and entertainment shows, the Jews could not compete: no, not even if their networks were multiplied by a thousand. Every one of the Jews channels would be ignored in favor of the one nationally accessible channel broadcast by the White nationalists.
The problem has been, to date, that we don't have even that one nationally accessible channel. The Internet is coming up as being an alternative to broadcast TV, but it is not yet on a par with it in terms of effectiveness. Perhaps one day it will be, but still it would be a good thing if White nationalists could afford to buy or build themselves a major TV network.
Anyone with a few billion dollars in spare cash that he does not need can donate it to the National Alliance, if he is so minded. Buying a major TV network is one of the things we have in mind to do, as soon as we have the money to do it. Send the appropriate negotiable instruments to National Alliance, P.O. Box 90, Hillsboro WV 24946. You'll be changing the world for the better.
Such a donation would make us strong enough to stop the tailspin, which Western Civilization now seems locked into, mobilize the populace against the traitors, win the war that we are now losing, and climb to new heights.
Perhaps you have some personal reason for wanting to dismantle the Jews' stranglehold on the mass media; maybe meddling by that media was instrumental in breaking up a major corporate project of yours, and you recognize the irony that the Jews' own corporate project is in no similar danger. Subsidize us, then, and we'll sack them for you.
And we could use the advice of White men who have done it before, White men who already have built up television networks and who have reason to regret having used them in collaboration with the Jews. Join us, once we have the means, and guide us in making another attempt to give Americans like ourselves a real presence in the minds of our people. Perhaps the better part of your career still lies ahead of you.
Also, there will be a time when we will need major acting talent for our own dramas, adventure stories, documentaries, and newscasts. You White actors and actresses should consider coming over to us, when we're ready to begin our productions. Isn't it about time that you put your talent, your power, into the service of good? But, as Princess Leia once said, "if money is what you care about..." then stay with the Jews over there in Hollywood. But if you want to help us make a world where money isn't the most important thing in life, then come let's make it happen.