When a government is a party to evil, as most governments today are, it is important for the "good guys" to understand that there are two policies in regard to violent action that they should avoid.

First, the forces for good, even though they will almost certainly be far weaker than the forces of evil, cannot afford to pursue a policy of only peaceful protesting. Peaceful protests will never alter the balance of power, and, moreover, they will be permitted only up to the point at which the forces of evil find them inconvenient. The forces for good must recognize that violence has both tactical and strategic advantages that they cannot give up and still have any chance of winning.

But because the forces of evil are stronger than those for good, it is important for the good guys to retain the initiative in the application of violence as much as possible. Most especially, it is important for the good guys to recognize when the bad guys are trying to trick the good guys into handing the bad guys a pretext for "legal" reprisals.

An example. In 2003, some young acquaintances of Ernst Zundel were outraged when they learned that leftists from Anti-Racist Action (ARA) had vandalized a house (in Canada) that was rented by Heritage Front Hotline broadcaster Gary Schipper. The Jews who covertly rule Canada had planted a stooge among these young fellows. The stooge recommended a specific act of violent retaliation against ARA. Ernst Zundel advised the angry young White men not to engage in violence; Zundel had surmised that this was a trap and that any violence from his young acquaintances would be used as a pretext by which to send them to prison. And so it was. Zundel's counsel was not heeded, and several young men, seeking revenge against ARA for their vandalism, were arrested for "starting a riot" and jailed.

So, essentially, the leftists had two victories instead of just one. Not only did they destroy some valuable property belonging to the pro-White side, they also contrived an ambush into which the good guys blindly walked.

If the angry young White men had been willing to let a few months go by, while they (in an organized fashion) quietly tracked the ARA members movements, they could have applied retaliatory violence much more effectively and with much less chance of being caught. But the qualities that make a hothead are not consistent with wisdom. A smart ambush goes unheralded by threats, the place and time are carefully chosen, and the attacker doesn't brag later.

When the good guys fight, they should be the ones choosing the time, the place, the nature and the number of the enemy forces, the objective to be attained and the means to be used. The idea is not to demonstrate any sort of bravery or moral superiority. It is a foolish knight who insists on keeping the moral high ground when he goes to battle against a dragon.

Racists are the good guys; they don't need to pose as the good guys. Too many battles have been lost already because racists felt that their "righteous anger" would be perceived as righteous by everyone else.

By being the instigators of violence, by being the ones who do the advance planning, racists can avoid most of the ambushes that they now all-too-commonly walk blindly into.