I’ve done more literature research into human evolution and prehistoric migrations that has caused me to adjust some of my earlier opinions on those subjects.

Five million years ago, the line of hominids that would become man separated from the line that would become the modern chimpanzee. The more manlike hominids evolved into Homo habilis in Africa about 2.8 million years ago.

Sometime during the next million years, wandering groups of habilis left Africa and began migrating across the Eurasian landmass in all available directions, but generally following watercourses and coastlines where fish and game were plentiful.

Those habilis that entered Europe and northern Asia evolved the most rapidly, becoming erectus almost at once and sapiens by about 700,000 years ago. The rapid evolution of the European hominids was impelled by the cold winters in two ways.

(1) The relative scarcity of food during the season required the ability to anticipate hardship, to postpone gratification, and to make good plans for the future.

(2) The cold itself provided an environmental pressure that selected larger brains as a defense against freezing to death: an increase in the size of an organ is a common adaptation to the threat of cold.

A similar evolution took place more slowly in southern and southeastern Asia, where the sapiens threshhold was crossed by Mongoloid erectus about 200,000 years ago. However, the aboriginal Mongoloid sapiens was probably inferior to European sapiens in the characteristics listed above.

The modern Asiatic race got a boost about 20,000 years ago when Cro-Magnon or proto-Celtic tribes, similar to but earlier than the Tocharians, migrated eastward, conquered and intermarried with the Asiatic aboriginals. The resulting hybrid was smarter (and better looking) than the pure Yoyoi Mongoloid. The effect of hybridization here was essentially the same as that which produces Negroid-White mulattoes, whose positive qualities vary in proportion to the White genes that they carry.

The hybrid Asiatics, who have since been inbred long enough to have become a race of distinct character, began pushing the aboriginals out of the choicest parts of Asia, and some of these were evicted from the continent entirely, chased across the Bering land bridge into North America. I’ll return to these in a bit.

African erectus didn’t become sapiens until about 30,000 years ago. Further, not all present African ethnic groups are sapiens today: some remain merely erectus. The lag in Black evolution, relative to White evolution, is on the order of 700,000 years, and the transition of the Black race to sapiens is still in progress.

(Don’t be fooled by the consistency with which the media show only the more highly evolved Africans. If a complete survey of African ethnicities, and their physiology, were taken from anthropological textbooks and presented to the American public in video documentaries, there would be many expressions of astonishment.)

Although they are interfertile, the modern races of man are not of the same species. The common ancestor species was habilis, which branched into several species of erectus, which have in turn produced their several races of sapiens. After habilis, nearly all important human evolution took place outside Africa.

The environmental pressures driving European evolution were greatest during the glacial periods. About 71,000 years ago, in the early part of the Wurm glaciation, this last great Ice Age was aggravated by a volcanic winter caused by the eruption of Mt. Tubo in Sumatra. For several years, suspended ash reflected even more of the sun’s heat than the ice did. The resulting harsh conditions nearly drove the European race extinct and had an impact even in the milder climates nearer the equator.

Europeans had to engage in ruthless eugenic self-selection, weeding out the unfit: the weak, the deformed, the unhandy, the inept, and the slow learner. These were killed (or were allowed to die) so that they would not be a drag on those who actually did have a chance to survive, as long as their energies weren’t dissipated by trying to take care of hopeless characters.

A hopeless character, at the time, was anyone who could not pull at least his own weight, in terms of primitive socio-economics. Tribes chose which of their members would survive much as schoolboys today choose each other for baseball teams, leaving out anyone known to be a poor batter, a clumsy catcher, a slow runner, etc. And the reason was the same. Just as the opposing team captains know that they will almost certainly lose the game if they do not apply exacting standards to their prospective team members, so too did the chieftains of primitive tribes, beleagured by a harsh environment, understand that their people would die if they tried to carry along the human incompetents.

The Wurm glaciation lasted from 80,000 years BP to 12,000 years BP. It was during this period that the characteristics of the modern White race, whose ancestors had already long been biologically distinct from the Asian sapiens and the African erectus, crystalized into its present form.

A theory currently fashionable among the Politically Correct is that H. sapiens emerged from Africa only 100,000 to 200,000 years ago and, during the aforementioned volcanic winter, suddenly diverged through genetic drift to become all the modern races of Mankind. Prior to that divergence, they claim, all humans were African-looking and much more similar to each other.

There are a number of problems with that theory, and the biggest one is that there are signs of human habitation outside Africa going back 400,000 years in Siberia and China; 600,000 years in England. The theory favoring a 135,000 years BP African origin for all modern sapiens cannot explain these earlier groups. Another large problem is that it is hardly likely that even the pressures of an Ice Age and a volcanic winter would produce all of the morphological, skeletomuscular, dental, neurological and biochemical differences known to exist between the White and Black races in only 70,000 years. Much more likely is the idea that the harsh glacial periods increased and refined differences that had already emerged, at least for the Europeans. That is, racial variation appeared in erectus, from whom sapiens inherited it.

The first true Whites were the Cro-Magnons, who appeared about 40,000 years ago. Cro-Magnon probably derived from a fortunate combination of Archaic Homo sapiens with possibly some mixture of European neanderthal, with the advantageous traits refined by subsequent inbreeding and with unwanted ones eliminated by both natural selection and deliberate culling.

There never were any Black or (racially) Asiatic Cro-Magnons. All Cro-Magnons were Whites, and from them came the White subraces: Nordic, Alpine, and Mediterranean.

The Mongoloid people, the aboriginal Asiatics, certainly had their own first stock. But that stock wasn’t Cro-Magnon. It evolved from the Homo habilis that migrated into Asia about 1.5 million years ago, becoming erectus and then sapiens about a half million years after similar transitions occurred in Europe.

The genetically unperturbed Black is a savage to whom civilization is, at best, an outward form, a mask or an act behind which he conceals his real nature for a time. It is a fact for which the evidence is all around us, from O.J. Simpson, to the Carr brothers, to the latest riot of Blacks in a major American city, but to which we persistently turn a blind eye.

Ironically, it is precisely those mulattoes who are least Black who comprise the bulk of those distinguished persons of whom the Black race is most proud. The pure Black has only a rudimentary capacity for literacy; the mulatto may often aspire to scholarship. But the Black pride in such persons is a false pride: their capacity comes from the White (or, occasionally, Asian) part of their biological equipment. If Political Correctness were not afflicting the perception of racial history, it would be clearer that even higher cultural levels are possible when White genes remain undiluted. Few, indeed, are the racially pure Blacks who are more than minimally sapiens. No group of Blacks, left to themselves, has ever made a country orderly and prosperous. It seems unlikely that any ever will, unless evolution finally lets the Negro catch up with the biologically quicker races.

Races in America.

The long-held, Politically Correct belief that the earliest Americans were an Asiatic off-shoot that crossed into North America via the Bering Ishmus has come into question and now appears to be false. Evidence has been gathering that the original Americans were Whites, possibly descendants of a sea-faring group of Cro-Magnons who landed on the Atlantic coasts of the Western continents at least 15,000 years ago, and possibly much earlier.

Meanwhile, in Asia, White colonists moved into central and eastern Asia and intermarried with the Mongoloids to produce a new hybrid race whose descendants today are the North Chinese and the higher stocks among the Japanese. This superior Asian race began displacing the inferior Yoyoi Mongoloid, and some groups of the latter fled across the Bering land bridge about 10,000 years ago.

Wave after wave of these “skraelings” (“ugly people,” as the Vikings would later call them), ousted from Asia, invaded North America and began a long, genocidal race-war in which the Whites who had preceded them were overwhelmed by numbers, defeated, and mostly exterminated.

Traces of the ancient genocide can be found in the blood of some “Native American” tribes, who possess genetic factors common to European peoples, but absent from Asians. The victorious early Asiatic Amerinds, after killing the White men, took the White women as war-brides. Additional evidence arises from “Indian” legends, many of which speak of a very ancient past when the cultural level was higher and fair-skinned blond or red-haired men either taught them, or fought them.

But even better evidence has come recently from archaeology. Several corpses and skeletons of White persons, preserved by natural or artificial means since prehistoric times, have been found in recent years. They are sometimes at first mistaken for bodies of recent murder victims, or for the remains of a White settler of the 18th or 19th century, and only discovered to be, say, ten thousand years old after scientists have done a radiocarbon dating.

After the news of the corpse’s age is made public, the local “Native American” associations typically become politically activist against further scientific testing—in particular, to determine the corpse’s race through mtDNA analysis. They invoke the NAGPRA law (Native American Grave Protection and Repatriation Act) to have the remains handed over to them for reburial.

(It would be wisdom on the part of physical anthropologists, therefore, to conduct mtDNA analysis before releasing to the public the results of radiocarbon dating on any ancient Causasoid remains that may be found in the future.)

The evident fact that Whites were first in North America and therefore have the prior claim to the land—or, at least, that the Asiatic-derived “Native American” may not justly complain about losing the rematch engagement to the White race—is one that the Indian tribes hope to conceal. The NAGPRA law, though ostensibly enacted to protect the religious sensibilities of Amerinds, has become a means by which the prior occupancy of North America by Whites can be hidden from the public and shielded from scientific validation.

It is the usual methodology for a dishonest law to preempt the facts with presumptive declarations, sometimes going so far as to attach legal penalties to any attempt to discover the truth or to any expression of opinion in opposition to Political Correctness. The very existence of such laws should at once arouse the suspicion of thoughtful people. The government of China, for example, actively suppresses scientific inquiry into the likelihood of a prehistoric White genetic impetus for subsequent Asian culture. Likewise, NAGPRA preemptively declares that all ancient human remains found in North America are to be presumed by race to be Asiatic “Native American,” even in cases for which there is evidence that the remains are those of someone of other race.

While the corpse was thought to be at most only a few centuries old, the preliminary scientific conclusion, based usually on skeletal dimensions and hair samples, that the remains are those of a White person, were not challenged. Politically, the “Native American” groups have nothing to lose by allowing the public to know that, now and then, an “Indian” got the better of a White settler in 1820, when Whites were winning a race-war against the Redskins.

But they have everything to lose if it becomes widely known that there was a much earlier race-war in which the Redskin was the aggressor and the original White inhabitants of North America were the victims. How can the “Indians” complain about being the victims of a crime that they committed first? (Without being laughed out of court, that is.) They can’t, and they know it. And they also know that they are lying when they say that these ancient remains of dead Whites are those of their ancestors, claimable under the NAGPRA law. Their motive is to prevent the truth from becoming known, so that they can keep the “pity benefits” of a formerly oppressed, now politically favored group.

Whenever an ancient corpse of a White person turns up, such as Si-Te-Cah skeletons, Kennewick Man, Spirit Cave Man, Wizards Beach Man, Buhl Woman, or Saulk Valley Man, the discovery threatens a well-established system of Amerindian vested interests, much as forensic tests done on samples of brick recovered from Auschwitz cast doubt on the “Nazi gas chamber” story and thus threatens the well-established system of Jewish vested interests. Those whose fortunes are based on lies don’t want the lies exposed.

The Jews are, of course, concerned mostly with their own frauds and hoaxes. But their goal is to destroy the White race, in order to remove it as an obstruction to their own primacy in the world, and, in the process, milk it for everything they can get. To achieve this purpose, it was necessary for them to fabricate, and to induce Whites to accept, a fiction in which Whites are much more nearly commensurate with other races in creative potential and in cultural attainments than is really the case. In other words, the racial equality myth is a weapon that was ever intended to demoralize Whites, to provoke treason among Whites, and to divide the White race against itself.

Accordingly, the Jewish media outlets promote the lies about historic and prehistoric African greatness, and they protect the belief concerning the original Asiatic-Amerindian habitation of North America.

But in nearly all such cases, the facts are otherwise. There was no conspicuous historic or prehistoric African greatness. The ruins of Zimbabwe, for example, were originally waystations and trading posts built by Arab merchant-colonizers hoping to exchange African goods for Chinese gold. The Negro bones found among the ruins were those of Black slaves, impressed into labor by their Arab masters.

Neither were the Asiatic migrants across the Bering land bridge the first humans to inhabit America. Before they came, Whites had already arrived: some by boat via Greenland into Newfoundland and Quebec, thence down the eastern coast of North America and inward via the St. Lawrence passage and the Great Lakes. The technique of carving arrowheads and spear points on both sides began with the Solutrean culture of northwestern Europe and was brought to North America by Whites.

Some of the “Native American” tribes in the eastern part of the continent were markedly more fair-skinned than their neighbors—for example, the Iroquois—evidence of a surviving White population having gone native after absorbing some Asiatic genes, or of an Asiatic Amerind tribe having bettered itself through a very large absorption of White genes. If the latter is the case, then it would be a repeat of the process that gave birth to the Northern Chinese and to the higher classes of Japanese. If the former is the case, then it would be a repeat of the process by which White civilizations have permitted interbreeding with racially inferior stocks, and consequently lost the capacity for civilization.

I've heard that the "recent diffusion" school of anthropologists point to a large variation in a particular chromosome for African populations, but which chromosome has only a small variation in non-African populations. This, they say, proves that the diffusion of Homo sapiens from Africa is "recent."

In a way, their argument does have merit. Mutations occur as the result of cosmic ray bombardment of human gametes destined to become babies. The more time goes by, the greater is the number of mutations that can accumulate. A population emerging from Africa "recently" probably would carry with them only a small fraction of the genetic variability remaining in the stay-in-Africa population, and there would not be enough time subsequently for many new mutations to occur in the migratory group.

So much is good reasoning. However, the recent diffusionists have, I think, shrunk the time scale. A good bit of this variation has probably been accumulating for millions of years, long before Homo habilis, as long ago, indeed, as our line of primates has carried the particular chomosome being studied. The "recentness" of the emergence from Africa is relative to the time over which the mutations have accumulated.

So, probably, it is possible that there really is no conflict between the DNA evidence and the fossil evidence, and that both point to the emergence of a late habilis or early erectus from Africa about 1.5 million years ago. It is not necessary to hypothesize a series of emergences of different hominid species, as the recent diffusionists do. The diaspora of a single species, which later developed racial adaptative pecularities and evolved to sapiens at variable rates (depending on environmental pressure) suffices to explain what we know.