Is calling a Black a Nigger a Felony?

If you ever doubted that the Jews were creepingly pushing toward criminalizing speech itself, doubt no longer. On the advice of an email correspondant, I browsed the
ABCNEWS website and learned that a prosecutor had filed a felony charge against a man for calling a Black a nigger. Wait! You'll be even more shocked when you learn the background.
The man is Lonny Rae, the husband of Kimberly Rae who was roughed up by a Black referee who, some believed, had made questionable decisions affecting the outcome of a sporting event. (The ABCNEWS editors did not believe that the name of the violent Black referee should be published.) Kimberly is a reporter who had taken photographs of the game, and the Black referee was struggling with her in order to steal her camera. Kimberly came away with the camera, but during the altercation the Black man's pulling and snatching caused the strap to make friction burn marks on her neck.
When Lonny found out about it, he became angry and tried to find the Black referee to punish him for injuring his wife and for daring to attempt the theft of her property. He was was prevented from meeting the Black referee by the county commissioner, who happened to be standing at the door of the locker room. He told the commissioner to bring forth the "nigger" who had hurt his wife, so he could apply a retribution on him personally.
Kimberly was treated for her injury at a hospital, and her husband contacted the sheriff to ask that charges be filed against the Black. Six weeks went by. Then Lonny Rae got a call to come to the sheriff's office. He went ...and was arrested himself! Originally charged with harrassment (name-calling on a man who had assaulted his wife) and disturbing the peace (being loud when he did it), the prosecutor later decided that Lonny's "crimes" were "serious enough" to be elevated to felonies.
How about that, friends? A Black man assaulted a White woman, whose husband became angry and called the Black assailant a nigger. And who gets charged with a crime? The White man does. No charges have been filed against the Black referee. Now, don't be fooled because an outlet of the Jewish media has carried this story. This event was bound to get noticed anyway, and the Jews are trying to garner the role of public critic so that they can control the extent of the criticism, the slant that will apply to it, and the ideological spin-offs that will emerge from it. Don't be distracted with extraneous references to famous racists, or to White racial organizations, or to unrelated allegations about White racism. Don't let your mind get fuzzy over the allegedly "related" article entitled "Can Racial Sensitivity Go Too Far?"
Keep your mind fixed on this point, and don't waver: a Black man hurt a White woman, and her White husband is on trial for the felony of referring impolitely to the nigger who did it.
Hiya, prosecutor. Want to try me alongside Lonny Rae? You might not be a nigger, but you may be something worse than one. This insane business of getting into favor with the media Jews by throwing blameless Whites into the juridical meat-grinder has some to stop somewhere, and this looks like as good a place to put the brakes on as any. From the ABCNEWS story:
"It's a matter of reading through the statute of the written law and seeing if the facts result in what you believe is a violation of the statutory law," said Myron Gabbert, the Adams County prosecutor. "These steps have been taken with regard to Mr. Rae. Under the facts as they are alleged to have occurred, the thought is that Mr. Rae has offended Idaho laws."
The facts are that a Black man inflicted minor, though painful, wounds on a White woman while attempting the theft of her property, namely a camera. THAT IS THE FACT OF PRIMARY IMPORTANCE. You have ignored that fact and focused on a lesser one: what the woman's husband said when he found out that his wife had been assaulted by a large Black man. You have maliciously contrived to elevate an understandable act of name-calling to the official category of serious crimes (felonies). You aren't really concerned with justice, or even with law-and-order. Your purpose is to threaten and intimidate other innocent White people with the power of the state, in the service of the Zionist agenda. You, Myron Gabbert, are a very wicked man. Your collaboration in this conspiracy to put Lonny Rae at fault is the biggest crime to this episode that I have so far found.
It is to be expected that the media will maintain an anti-White bias with respect to reporting interracial crimes. The Jews hate (Aryan) Whites, and the Blacks are the weapon readiest to their hands. But the police, who should know better, have played along with the media's policymaking about who should be considered the bad guys.
It began, perhaps, with the protest speeches staged by George Lincoln Rockwell. He'd get a permit to speak out against the Jews' destruction of the traditional American way of life. He would arrive with some of his party at a public place, such as a park. Rockwell would begin speaking. The police, though initially present, would fade into the background. A large gang of Jews and/or Jew-led Blacks would pour into the area, making threats, wearing masks, and being generally disruptive...all without a permit, of course. Occasionally, these Jews and Blacks would attack Rockwell's tiny band, and Rockwell himself sustained wounds during these attacks that sent him to the hospital afterward. Once a member of his party was crippled for life.
And where were the police during these encounters? Hiding. They knew that the JEWS were behind the attack, and they didn't want to incur the political retribution of the Jews' fellow tribesmen. So they did not do their jobs by protecting George Lincoln Rockwell's freedom of speech when a crowd of Jews and Blacks came to take it away from him. Once Rockwell was arrested for attempting to continue his speech, the speech he had secured a permit to make, after his party had been attacked by Jewish rabble.
Since then, the police have repeatedly shown this kind of cowardice or partisanship. They act really brave when they can suppress a few unarmed (and usually law-abiding) "neo-Nazis," but indecisively—to say the least—when confronted with a genuinely menacing and dangerous crowd of Communist or Zionist Jews and their Black strongarms. There was a time, long ago, when the cops knew which heads to break and when to break them. But the political missteps resulting from America's taking the wrong side during WW2 have not been repaired; indeed, they've been extended further afield with a swagger, while White Americans, police included, are increasingly prone to engage in self-deception as their country falls apart.
You can see this disease in the courtroom and in the offices of prosecuting attorneys. Not all the races are held to the one, same, legal standard. Whites live under the harshest, strictest set of rules, much as though they were serfs, social and legal inferiors, to the Jews and the Blacks who comprise the actual lords of the land. Indeed, the races should not be held to the same legal standard. The laws that keep Whites orderly and productive are the laws that make Blacks inclined to engage in violent, predatory behavior.
Why do Blacks and Browns immigrate into White countries in a veritable flood, while Whites in general abhor the idea of moving to the Third World? It is because Whites can create better countries than non-Whites. The colored folks come to the White countries so that some of this White wealth will rub off on them. But when so many of them have come that our countries are no longer White countries, they will have killed the engine of civilization. Each country that falls in this way is one more country of the Third World; it is no longer in the avant garde of Mankind. The world has one fewer well-springs of prosperity than it had before the niggers took it over. If Blacks and Browns had in them what Whites have, then they would not need to move into White areas to produce equivalently. The implications of that fact are obvious, and they are really all that need be understood to appreciate how the police in a White country should behave toward non-White invaders.
But the "double standard" that has grown up in America is not only the wrong one; it is the opposite of the right one. When a White hits a Jew or a Black, all the law's big wheels start turning to grind him to powder. But when a Black hurts a White, nothing happens. The rules that apply to Blacks are more forgiving, less restrictive. And if a White defends himself successfully from the Black, the White is often treated as though he were at fault.
The police can fight White people all they want, rightly or wrongly, and they know that the media won't bother them for it. But those same cops are afraid of being labeled "racial profilers," and so they won't fight Blacks, even when those Blacks are committing violent crimes in front of them. Fellow Whites, we don't need police of this kind. We don't need police who can't figure out that racial profiling is as legitimate and more useful than any other kind of profiling. We don't need police who don't have the guts to stand up to the media—and if necessary break the heads of the media bosses rather than attacking innocent Whites or, through inaction, allowing White people to come to harm.
In a war, when your country has been invaded, every policeman is a soldier. We are at war. The country is occupied. But the soldiers are afraid to do the right things. Instead, they do what will get them praise from the occupation government. And upon receiving the enemy's commendation, they pretend that they are heroes. They grin at each other when they shoot a White who would not yield to his people's enemies. They talk the talk of macho-men when they are really too chicken to take the fight to where it needs to go.
