While eating breakfast this morning, I recalled a segment of film that I had watched many years ago. Richard Nixon, while preparing himself for his last presidential speech in which he would resign from office, asked his audience whether any of them were Secret Service agents. A number of men spoke up.

"Get out!" said Richard Nixon.

They refused to leave.

Now, you might figure that the refusal of the Secret Service agents to leave the President's presence before a televised speech was justified on some legal authority higher than the President himself. As I remember, that was the idea that the media encouraged television-viewers to accept. But it isn't so. The Constitution provides no such authority. If the Secret Service agents had one in mind, then it wasn't a legal authority, but an illicit one.

When he saw that he could not make the Secret Service agents obey him, Nixon smiled ingratiatingly and made out as though he were only kidding. But somehow, I doubt it.

I can't help wondering whether Nixon would have presented a different speech if he could only have gotten out the immediate range of Secret Service small arms fire. The Secret Service is an attachment of the Treasury Department, and where you find a national treasury you usually find Jews managing (pillaging) it. Today, we understand that the way power really works is not the way it is made to appear.

My suspicion is that the Secret Service's task is to protect the president when the Jews regard him as a "good boy," but to make an inconveniently nationalist president disappear. If so, then the Secret Service would be a dagger pointed directly at the heart of our so-called "democratic" system. I would recommend that any US President with America-first priorities who might be elected in the future call upon hand-picked members of the Army and Marines to replace the Secret Service as his protectors.

Otherwise, he might not live very long.