I'm negative a lot. Other races are gaining powers, money and territory from us, and we can't seem to get organized to resist them effectively. Most of the reason for our failure to organize on the required scales is that the White race has a treason problem. The traitors among us have come to the fore and now have their hands on the levers of power. Since the traitors know that they will die if racially loyal Whites become powerful, they inhibit White racial organization just as strenuously as they dare.

But I can't merely be negative. I must be positive sometimes, too.

I recently read a transcript of a speech by a White woman who conveyed some very important ideas to an audience of White women. She saved the most important idea for last.

We need to start procreating ladies. There is just no way around it. We need more of us—and less of them.

And that's the heart of the matter. If White women don't start having babies—and LOTS of them—we'll become extinct, and it won't matter what victories White men may have in poitics or in battle. Without children, we'd die out even if the Jews weren't trying to hasten the process of erasing us.

And it isn't just quantity of babies that we need. We need quality too. The misguided wars in America and in Europe during the past 200 years has left our race badly depleted. We're not—by and large—the same race we were a few hundred years ago. Our best, strongest and bravest men have been maneuvered (by the Jews) into killing each other off. The quality we had is mostly gone, and we must rebuild it.

But to get the quality, we must first have the quantity.

I hope that my White sisters will excuse my presumptuousness. But those of you who could go furthest in a career are precisely those who should have the most babies. Why's that? Because talent is mostly inherited, and it is better for your gifts to be invested, and multiplied, in future generations than wholly spent in one generation. That's simply common sense, isn't it?

If you're smart enough to be a chemist or an engineer, then you should pass on your brains to sons, so that they, and their sons, and their grandsons, can be chemists and engineers many times over. It's a question of whether our race will have one trained and working professional NOW, or whether it will have unknown hundreds of them, your descendants, in the future.

Nature is usually much more generous with her rewards than any "stock market" or investment scheme devised by economists. Your savings account pays maybe 6% in annual interest, meaning that in one year your balance of $100 will rise to $106. Of course, this must be corrected for inflation, and you're lucky if the real buying power of your account balance has risen at all. You can "get ahead" somewhat in the stock market, where—if you're lucky—you can get an increase of 20% or 30% in a single year. Of course, if you're not lucky you can lose everything.

But—plant a grain of corn and keep it watered and safe from the birds, and in only 100 days you will get a gain of about 50000% (fifty thousand percent), as you harvest ears of corn having a total of 500 grains.* Nature is much superior to artificial economic systems as a source of gain, except perhaps for the Top Exploiters (Jewish bankers and such) in the latter. And the rule applies to spending your life investing in children. If you work at it, you might have ten children, and those ten children might become their own nation if they continue to practice in their own lives the wisdom that you used in making them.

*It is to prevent the "little people" from getting gains of this magnitude that agribusiness only sells hybrid seeds to farmers. Hybrid crops are "plant mongrels" that do not have the ability to reproduce their own kind. There are, fortunately, environmentalist organizations that are devoted to preserving the genetic heritage of "pure" vegetable strains, and seeds can be ordered cheaply from them.

However much it gratifies you to have a career, keep in mind that there is no career, no method of "chasing the buck" that pays as much as motherhood does. There is nothing that men do that is as excellent as creating the next generation of our race. Everything that men by tradition do, all piled up together, is not as important as that one thing that only women can do, simply because if you don't do it, then nothing men do will matter.

If you can do both, fine. Have your children and a career too. But if ever one must give way to the other—and sooner or later there will almost certainly be a conflict—let the career go and keep on having children. Choose another child, instead of a promotion. Choose the spiritual health of your child, instead of a materially advantageous job transfer. At this stage of our struggle for existence, there is no such thing as too many children. Your children might not have all of the comforts that money can buy, but more is still better than less.

Why is that?

If you are able to produce genetically superior children, you should be doing that regardless of whether you can afford to develop them to their highest potential. Perhaps a generation or two will go by in which the potential of White people will neglected, rather than developed and put to use. So be it. But the genes that create that potential must be reproduced in each generation! If those genes die, then the potential that they create will also die, and never again will it exist on earth.

But how do you measure your own quality, unless you have already devoted time to a career? You should measure it in the same way that employers do—and then deny yourself to the employers! For every 80 points on the SAT I that your composite score exceeds 800 points, or for every 5 points by which your IQ exceeds 100, have one child by a worthy mate: a man as "qualified" as you are to produce children.

If you are especially athletic, add some suitable number of children to the total. The "worksheet" that follows is only a suggestion. But there should be some way by which everyone can tell whether she should be having more, or fewer, children based on an objective estimate of her abilities.

If you know about a serious heritable defect in your family, such as diabetes or severe nearsightedness (to the point of "legal blindness"), then rather than have children of your own, you can become an adoptive aunt for healthy White kids. Remember "Aunt Jo" from Louisa Mae Alcott's book Little Men? You don't have to run a boarding school, but you can run a Whites-only daycare center that doesn't preach multiculturalism.

The government won't subsidize a White eugenics program officially, of course, since the Jews disapprove of Whites working to regain their racial quality. But you can do it on the quiet, without telling anybody what you're up to. To everybody else, you're just having babies and/or taking care of other people's children because you like kids. Only you should know about the racial side of your program.

Do you see all those niggers and fat-slovenly White trash women standing in line down at the welfare office? Well, if you have to, you can stand in line with them and get a check every month just like they do. Why should the lowest people get all the benefits of those tax dollars?

You know as well as I do that it would be better for that money to be used to increase the quality of our race, rather than to lower it still further. So, if you must raid the enemy's supply wagons, don't hesitate to do it on any specious moral grounds: it is simply what must be done.

My "worksheet" on how many children you should have is only a suggestion, but something like it should be decided on and followed. We're in a war, and we are losing. Our ship is on fire, and the enemy is closing in for the kill. The eternal night of extinction is lowering upon us.

You are the builders of the race. You can launch better ships than anything they have. Only you can save our people, push back the night, rebuild the fleet, and beat the enemy. Will you do it?

Jerry's Posts Index Page
Jerry's Aryan Battle Page