In March 2006, a Black woman named Crystal Gail Mangum accused three White men of kidnapping and raping her in a house in Durham County, North Carolina. The accused were students at Duke University. The accuser attended North Carolina Central University, a Black school. The White men were also players for Duke's lacrosse team. The Black woman was also a stripper and a professional escort (i.e., prostitute). The crime allegedly took place about midnight on the night of 13-14 March.

You'll want to know what my background sources were, of course.

Wikipedia's article on Crystal Gail Mangum

Wikipedia throws in an incidental reference to Negress Mangum having been a "Radio Operator & Navigator" for the U.S. Navy. Oh? Am I to believe that this wicked, lying she-nigger knows enough about radar waveforms and Fourier transforms to create an ambiguity diagram? Or that she knows enough about celestial navigation to find her position on the open ocean by the stars and a clock? Yes, I'm probably supposed to believe those things, but I don't.

Placing an irrelevant mention of Mangum's former job title in the Navy was just Wikipedia's left-handed way of trying to "salvage" the article (from their multicultural point of view) by implicitly exaggerating the intelligence of a Black woman. Wikipedia omits to mention that Mangum was forced to separate from the service and that, during her stint in the Navy she committed an adultery that led to her divorce. The leftist online encyclopedia thus gives illusory support to Black intellectual capacity while covering up a genuine Black moral deficiency.

Nicholas Stix’ Absolutely Definitive Account Of The Incredible Disappearing Duke Rape Hoax

Durham-in-Wonderland: Comments and analysis about the Duke/Nifong case

William L. Anderson has written an astonishing series of essays on the Duke Hoax-Rape Case. I present links to his relevant articles here. They give the picture of the political corruption behind the nigger-lies far more thoroughly than Wikipedia does.

By William L. Anderson:
Duke, DNA, and the Law: Politics Over Principle
The Earl of Dook, or the Continuing State of State Justice in North Carolina
Duke Lacrosse: A 'Meaning' in Search of a Scandal
Why the Duke Case Matters
Tawana Brawley II
Criminal Prosecution: How Michael Nifong Intends To Frame the Duke Defendants
Ruth Sheehan’s Silence is Sickening
Blogs and the Mainstream Press
Desperate Times
Boulder, Durham, and Sham Justice
Nifonging the Standards of Justice (Part 1)
Duke’s Reichstag Fire
Nifonging the Standards of Justice (Part 2)
Duke and the Death of Academe
Duke and Deceit: Brodhead’s Folly
The NAACP and Jim Crow Justice
Why the Duke Hoax Continues (Part 1)
Why the Duke Hoax Continues (Part 2)
Why the Duke Hoax Continues (Part 3)
Post-Modern Prosecutions
Why I Write on the Duke Lacrosse Case
What if the Duke 3 Had Been Black?
Durham and Scottsboro
Durham, Duke, and Dishonor
An Open Letter to the Innocence Project
Duke: The Lies Continue
Duke and Durham: The Criminal Cover-up Continues
Duke and the Politics of Rape
An Open Letter to Michael Nifong
What the Duke Non-Rape (and Non-Kidnapping/Sexual Assault) Case Taught Me
Duke: The Anatomy of a Hoax
Duke’s Upcoming Liability, or Richard Brodhead Needs to Find a Good Lawyer
Michael Nifong’s Spaghetti Factory
Racial Diversity and Elite Educational Institutions: Duke’s Meltdown
The Cost of the Lie: Duke, the Courts, and Hoaxes
Duke and Durham: The Criminal Cover-up Continues
Michael B. Nifong and the Sociopathic State

North Carolina is a state where the judicial process has been especially corrupted by leftist Political Correctness: more so than is true for most other U.S. states. Prosecutors frequently bring off-the-wall false charges against people to serve their political ambitions, to get Black votes in an election, or to garner favor in some other way, and sending someone innocent into a state prison full of homosexual gang-raping niggers where he'll die of either AIDS or violence. Leftists use the political situation to their advantage, threatening false charges and, when necessary, carrying out the threats. Juries are frequently loaded with Blacks who couldn't care less whether a defendant were innocent or guilty; they're going to convict the White and let the Black go free if it is within their power.

Really, there's not much good in North Carolina except that some excellent wool socks are made by certain manufacturers in Catawba County. Politically, the state is a cesspit: worse, even, than Georgia.

What is most admirable about the accused lacrosse players is the way they stuck together despite what must have been tremendous pressure of the "Prisoner's Dilemma" sort. Any of those young men could probably have bought himself immunity from prosecution by being the first to support DA Michael Nifong's lies. Yet none of them succumbed to the temptation to buy his own safety at the expense of the others, and that's more than commendable.

The most reprehensible thing about this episode, other than Nifong's politically motivated betrayal of his office, is the anti-White bias in the Jewish media. In January 2006, about two months before the falsely alleged rape at Duke University, there was an actual rape at the University of Richmond (Virginia) in which a White coed was attacked by four Black students from nearby Virginia Union University, one of whom was a former quarterback from the VUU football team. But in that rape case, there was no national media coverage. The Jews who make policy for the mass media simply weren't interested in it because they couldn't use it to make Blacks look good (or to make Whites look bad). So it was ignored.

In the VUU rape case, no professors went on a crusade against the Black students who perpetrated the crime. The President of VUU didn't see fit to expell anyone, to fire any coaches, or to cancel the football season - all of whichlike did occur at Duke University as the result of Crystal Gail Mangum's malicious lies. And no District Attorneys gave it any special attention. Three of the black rapists were convicted, but their sentences were trivial. One of them got only four months in jail. The White lacrosse players at Duke were threatened with 31 years in prison. Do you see how different things are when Whites are accused of rape, instead of Blacks?

Black males perpetrate rape much more often than White men do: about five times as often, according to Justice Department statistics. When you examine only rapes for which the perpetrator(s) and the victim(s) are of opposite races, the ratio gets even more lopsided. In one-on-one interracial rapes, Black men rape White women about 90 times more often than the reverse. For interracial gang rapes, crimes having Black perpetrators are about 200 times more common than those having White perpetrators. Furthermore, Blacks from Durham and from NCCU have for years made a sport of attacking and raping White coeds at Duke University. Notice that rape becomes a serious crime to the Jewish media only when White men are accused of raping Black women.

There's a curious, and apparently inexplicable, facet in the collective behavior of organized feminists. You'd think that since Black males are much more likely to rape women than White men are, that feminists would correctly apportion rape-blame by race, instead of getting it turned around backwards, as they do with their race-specific hostility toward "privileged White men." When you look for explanations for this weirdness, the most logical conclusion is that feminism isn't really what it pretends to be.

If you remember, feminism ostensibly began as a movement to secure "gender equality." Later, it turned out that that was only a pretense, that feminists would, given any conflict with justice or moral rightness, aggressively pursue women's interests even when the woman was in the wrong. Now it appears that this, too, is a sham - or, if it is not a sham, then it must at least be true that the interests of women have a lower priority among feminists than leftist racial politics do. The higher you go in the hierarchy of purpose, the nearer feminism approaches to Zionism's agenda for the goyim: race-mixing with preference for the non-Whites.

White feminists have made a bad bargain with the devil. They must support Black women who accuse White men of rape, even though the accusations are usually false. But Blacks do not defend White women who have been raped by Blacks, and, on top of that, White feminists are pressured to pretend that they do not notice which side of the racial fence most of the rapes are coming from. Instead, they must live a lie or be ostracised, or worse. Why would an honest White woman want to be a feminist anymore?

Jerry's Posts Index Page
Jerry's Aryan Battle Page