with Kirsten Kaiser
The ABCNews.Com interview with Kirsten Kaiser is at
http://204.202.137.117/onair/DailyNews/2020_rightwomen_000210_chat.html
The title of the "Chat Session" was
Escape From Hate
Abandoning Racist Beliefs
If ever you doubted that liberalism is essentially a secular religion, ponder the fact that the title chosen for this chat session resembles a title that you might expect to find on a Bible Tract: "Escape from Sin - Abandoning Heretical Beliefs."
On 10 February 2000, Kirsten Helene Kaiser, the former wife of White nationalist Kevin Alfred Strom spent an evening answering set-piece questions thrown at her by ever-so Politically Correct fellow chatters. The questions followed an introduction by the moderator, which was biased blatantly against Kevin Alfred Strom and venomously hostile to the beliefs of White nationalists. You could see at a glance that this "chat session" was propaganda staged by the Jews at ABC and intended to demoralize White people who might be inclined to resist multiculturalism.
Racial nationalism, which the moderator called "the message of hate," is nothing but a fact about the human species that has been known, acknowledged, and advantageously lived with for thousands of years. Racism is what happens when human tribal loyalties are affronted by racial mixing. The lesson, which all our history teaches, is Don't Mix the Races. It is modern liberalism that is the error, the disingenuous quirk, and the dysfunctional view of life. Liberalism appeals to "warm and fuzzy" sentiments, much as Marxism appeals to poor people, but, in the long run, liberal racial policies fail because of human tribal instincts and racial differences, just as Marxism fails from what economists call "the tragedy of the commons." Multiculturalism is contrary to nature, and in the long run always leads to disaster.
A chatter named "France" asked, "Are your children showing any signs of racial hatred, and if so, how are you approaching this problem?"
Am I the only one who perceives a slant developing here? Is anyone wondering whether another question, posed later by someone else, will be phrased like this:
"Are your children racially aware, and if not, how are you going to remedy that deficiency in their spiritual development?"
Let me settle it. No. No one allowed to speak in the chat room ever asks a question with pro-White or pro-Nationalist presumptions.
Making children aware of their racial heritage, of the greatness of their people, of the friction and violence that always arise when the races are mixed — whether or not there are any "racists" there to "agitate" them — and the threats presented to their race by other groups, now and historically, these are good things to teach children, and they are called "racial hatred" only when White people do them.
Kirsten answers that her son had "a few incidents" at school and at daycare, and it sure doesn't seem as though she has taken her stand behind her son. Instead, she has taken it behind Political Correctness. Apparently, the more her son experiences trouble during encounters with Blacks, the more she will expose him to more Blacks. She evidently goes to great lengths to do this.
One of the facts about race that I teach on my website is this one:
FACT: There is no age group for which the Black violent crime perpetration rate is low enough to approach the White rate, even approximately. That goes for children, high school teens, young adults, middle aged adults, and old people.
Blacks have such a track record for violent behavior that a White mother who deliberately exposes her children to Blacks, and who works night and day to undermine their natural bias in favor of their own race, should lose all rights of child custody.
Another chatter said, "As a teacher speaking with my students today, how dangerous do you think these people are, and how does a person really believe this hate?" The chatter might be a teacher. But his going out of his way to say so in preamble suggests that he's an ADL or Jewsmedia stooge selected to pose this very question.
Kirsten replied with a statement that contains several deceptions. I'll quote her reply here.
"The reason why they will hate is that there is always some truth to what they are saying, and then they take it further and further. As far as how dangerous it is, tell that to the people at Columbine High School. I think it is extremely dangerous. They will incite acts of violence — look at the comic books they put out. It's all about starting racial tensions or a race war at school."
And now I'll begin with the corrections.
National Vanguard Books has published one comic book and that comic book is titled "The Saga of White Will." It tells the story of how a White student discovers in his high school a Jewish-Black domination of Whites, with the Blacks providing the terrorism in the halls and on the school grounds, while the Jews disseminate obfuscatory "brotherhood" propaganda and corrupt the school principal. As the story in the comic book begins, a race-war has already started, and the White students are losing. They are losing because they won't fight back. Blacks pinch White girls on the buttocks or breasts, and they gang up against White boys, and they get away with it because the authorities don't want to do anything for fear of being called "racist" and maybe losing their jobs.
The hero of the comic book, White Will, isn't afraid. He has singlehandedly taken on several Blacks, after they ganged up on a White boy or fondled a White girl, and has beaten them in fights. White Will protects the White students, and he gets into trouble for it with the corrupted principal. After he learns more about the situation from an older man named "Mr. O'Brien" (Dr. Pierce's counterpart in the comic book's world), White Will begins organizing the White students so that they can better defend themselves. The Whites learn to resist. They learn that it is OK to fight when you are threatened.
Kirsten's characterization of the book as an encouragement to "start" racial tensions or a race war is deceptive. The fact is that in many racially mixed high schools those racial tensions already exist, and the White students are bearing the entire brunt of them. Blacks walk all over the Whites as though they were door mats. I repeat, the racial tensions already exist: they began with school integration, and they have never once lifted, but have only gotten worse with time. White high school students must learn to fight back, or else things will get so bad that they will have to avoid the public schools.
Kirsten's next deception has to do with the Columbine High School massacre. From the beginning, the Jewish media have presented the shooting spree of Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris as the act of "neo-Nazis" hunting down mostly Black victims. On the contray, these two killers were ANTI-racists, people who had made public threats against racists. Dylan Klebold is a Jew. And only one of the 15 victims was Black. The public simply must begin to understand that the Jewish media lies, and when it does not lie it deceives though calculated omission, and whenever it uses the truth, it is only to sweeten or to cloak a falsehood.
In addition to the students shown above, the Columbine Killers murdered a White high school teacher. How could the media present two anti-racist killers, one of them Jewish, as two racist "Nazi" killers? How could the media pretend that Harris and Klebold "went after" Blacks when, obviously, they mostly killed Whites? Well, if you don't know by now about the depths of deception to which the Jewish media bosses will go, in order to deceive you, then you have some catching up to do.
Finally, there's Kirsten's admission that there is "some truth" to what we are saying. Actually, that too is a deception. It is calculated to make the reader think that we racial nationalists do what the Jewish media does: use carefully selected bits of the truth to sweeten or mask a larger lie. We racists don't merely provide "some truth" — we provide it all, all the facts that the Jews work so hard to conceal or to remove from the consciousness of the public.
An example might be valuable. In an issue of Tacoma Reporter, a writer named Ashley Newton claimed that he'd studied the relevant documents from the Centers for Disease Control and learned that (1) Blacks are only "twice as likely" as Whites to be infected with HIV and (2) that the National Alliance sticker that warns White women that Black heterosexual men are 14 times as likely as White heterosexual men to be infected with HIV is wrong. On the contrary, the National Alliance sticker is correct, and Ashley Newton is wrong. You can get the rest of what I had to say about Ashley Newton's lie here:
http://www2.netcom.com/~jna/facts/AIDSrace.html
Remember, this is just an example. I could go on to give other examples — indeed practically endless examples — of the lies, evasions, obfuscations and distortions of the Jewish media, but I have other things to do today. You might browse my website for more.
The reader's impression that the chatters, other than Kirsten, are Jewish actors typing set-piece questions grows with each new question he reads. The evidence is in their mouthy preambles and in the tightly-in-the-groove Politically Correct style of their questions, both in the choice of topics and in choice of words. Likewise, there's an organization to the questions, as well as a lack of redundancy and spontaneity, a certain air-brushed quality, to the chat session that makes me doubt that the chatters in this ABCNews.com session were simply whoever happened to show up. And all the way through the session, not once did two chatters impose their questions on Kirsten at about the same time. Instead, it was Question, Kirsten's Reply, Question, Kirsten's Reply ...etc... to the very end. This "chat session" was apparently planned and rehearsed, and perhaps edited as well.
And that's crooked. If ABCNews had simply done an interview and had honestly identified Kirsten's questioners (so that readers would understand their probable motives and viewpoints) as, for example, a rabbi, an ADL operative, a liberal journalist, and such, then we could still accuse them of bias, but not of fraud. But, then, fraud is what we've come to expect from the Jewish media.