Abraham entered Egypt around 1800 BC and subsequently may have conveyed information of military value to the (Semitic) Hyskos, who invaded and conquered Egypt from 1750-1675 BC. The Hyskos established a parasitical rule of political and economic oppression (a kind of ancient Soviet Union), which prompted the Egyptians to rebel. There was a bloody war, culminating in a siege of the Hyskos stronghold of Avaris in 1550 BC. The warring parties negotiated a settlement in which the Hyskos would be permitted to leave peaceably. This agreement was a mistake on Egypt's part. They should have continued the seige until the Semites starved. Had they done so, history would have taken a different, and probably a much better course through the next 3500 years. If we Aryans should someday be in the same situation, let us not repeat the error.
However, not all of them left. Some Hyskos remained secretly and mingled with the Egyptians. These stay-behinds became the Hebrews. One of them, Joseph, wormed his way into the confidence of the Pharaoh and was given the authority of a Viceroy. Using this authority, Joseph levied grain taxes that left the state warehouses full and left the Egyptian people with no local grain reserves. The agricultural practice of the time was to use the grain saved in good years to feed the people in poor ones. That practice, however, was predicated on the assumption that the grain would be doled out to the nation in order to provide for its continued well-being.
However, with a "Jew" holding the keys to the government's warehouses, this assumption completely broke down. Joseph used the poor years to create a famine, which inflated grain prices, which obliged the Egyptians to sell all their property in order to buy food to eat, and, when they had no more property left to sell, to sell themselves into slavery. It was the first time in history (so far as is known) that the Jews spoiled a White country through the application of economic exploitation. They have used this same pattern again and again under one ideological disguise or another, even unto this day.
Let's think about how this trick is done. From where came the power of Joseph to impose taxes? It came from his authority to use the Pharaoh's soldiers. And, since soldiers must eat, the power of the military really originated in the labor of the Egyptian farmer. At first, the Jews probably put out some sort of propaganda about how a centralized, national system of food reserves was "more efficient," so that the Egyptians would go along with it and not rebel early in the enslavement process, when a rebellion might have succeeded. But once the Jews had the grain, and thus the means to feed the soldiers under Joseph's viceroyal command, the Egyptian people were well and truly captured. They were slaves at that point, whether they knew it or not.
And probably, at first, they didn't know it, other than a few farsighted Egyptians who were, no doubt, dismissed by the rest as "extremists" or "alarmists" or "cranks." But then came the poor harvest, and when the people turned to their national government for a disbursement of the saved grain, they found soldiers standing before the warehouses, and they found Hebrew bureaucrats grinning at them from behind desks.
"Would you have grain?" a bureaucrat might say. "Never fear, we're your government, and we are here to help. The National Food Bank is open for business, and on these tablets you will find our goods listed according to quantity and price."
At that point, long after it was too late to save themselves, most of the Egyptians probably understood that they had been betrayed and robbed by their government. They had grown the grain. The government (through Joseph) had taxed most of it, leaving them with false assurances and barely enough to eat. They had probably believed that the taxed grain, minus what the Pharaoh took for the royal tables, would be returned to them without charge during the years of scarcity, as had been done before. Ah, but now that the Jew had taken over, things were different. Now the Egyptians had to pay to get what they had themselves grown, and the prices were very high!
A priest of ancient Egypt, writing about conditions in his times, remarked on conditions in his country. I will give his statements in paraphrase, with additions by me in parentheses.
Semites have moved into Egypt. They have seized the harvests, diverted the streams, and drained the fish ponds. The custom of ritual, sanitary burial has been abandoned, and dead bodies are now thrown into the river. Social chaos (multiculturalism) abounds in the land, and the natural aristocratic order has been turned upside down (egalitarianism). Murder happens in broad daylight, and people look the other way (moral degeneracy). The ties of kinship have been weakened so that men no longer love their brothers (cosmopolitianism). Everyone demands to be accepted as they are, saying "Love me!" (humanism), but everything good in life has disappeared (tragedy of the commons). Property is taken away from its rightful owners and given to others (communism). If someone ventures an unpopular opinion, others reach for sticks and say "Kill him!" (political correctness). The people become poorer while taxes and bureaucrats increase (liberalism). The better people lose so that the inferior might gain (Affirmative Action).
Doesn't this sound exactly like the trend in which America has been going? And are we not justified in suspecting that similar conditions may stem from similar causes? Ancient Egypt had a problem with a parasitical foreign invader that dominated the native people for several centuries. So does America: the problem is the Jews. And, incidentally, the food shortages of Germany and Ukraine during the mid-20th century were also contrived by Jews. And in 1971, a Jew named Michael Fribourg created a grain scarcity in the United States that quadrupled the prices of corn and wheat—he schemed with Richard Nixon to subsidize (at American taxpayers' expense) a transfer of a quarter of the US grain harvest to Russia at bargain prices to the Russians.
In November of 1971, Michael Fribourg completed a deal with the Soviet Union, through Nickolai Belousou, the Chief of Exportkhelb, the Russian grain-purchasing agency; for 900,000 tons of American surplus barley and oats, 2-million tons of corn, and 282-million bushels of wheat. The total figure was something in excess of 18-million metric tons of grain sold to the Soviet Union. This tremendous sale was financed by a combination of U.S. guaranteed credits and U.S. subsidized prices. So once again the Soviet Union was saved, American farmers and taxpayers had been ripped off again.
Getting control of a people through control of their food supply is a strategy that would occur to any predatory tribe determined to subjugate nations that they invaded with the purpose of turning its people into "cash cows." And historically, the Jews have used that strategy over, and over, and over... and seldom do the gentiles catch on to the trick in time to save themselves. And now, in America, it is happening again.
Incidentally, the Greek Stoics noticed that the Jews would not bow before emporers, wouldn't worship the same gods as everybody else, but they would worship idols of their own making (the Stoics mentioned "the head of an ass" kept in one of their temples) in practices similar to that of the better known Golden Calf. They Stoics also made the Blood Accusation by saying that the Jews sacrificed a man "in a grove" every year, after which they would eat parts of his corpse after swearing on them to hate all gentiles. Apollonius Molo said, "The Jews are the enemies of all mankind... they are the worst of all men." He has been echoed down the centuries by many, many others.