US Government Aggression against White Americans

Back in the 1930s, the U.S. Government, speaking to the American people with the voice of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, made two outstanding promises to the American people.

(1) The United States would not get into another war in Europe.

(2) The Social Security Number would never be used for other than Social Security purposes.

Trusting in the honor of the speaker of those promises, Americans re-elected Roosevelt as their president. And FDR at once set about breaking the promises that he had made to gain his re-election. America went to war again. The Social Security Number was used to identify most taxpayers, and subsequently it was also used for a practically unending list of other purposes.

Around 1990, when state governments were trying to make the use of seat belts mandatory and to penalize motorists who failed to wear them, the people of those states protested that it would give the police an excuse to pull them over to check for seatbelts (and, in the process, subject them to casual random searches sans warrant). In order to gain the passage of the seatbelt laws, the state governments and the law enforcement agencies had to promise that, no, they would never pull anyone over just to check for seatbelt use. If anybody ever got a ticket for non-compliance with the seatbelt law, they would first be pulled over for some other reason, such as speeding or running a stop sign.

Trusting in the honor of the speakers of those promises, residents of the several states acceded to the seatbelt laws. The promises of limited enforcement were kept for five or ten years. And then... I was stopped at a checkpoint in Buckeye, West Virginia, in the summer of 2002 by policemen who were doing nothing other than checking motorists for the use of seatbelts. Fortunately, I was wearing mine. I received a sanctimonious "Thank you, sir, for wearing your seatbelts" and waved on. If I had not been wearing them, I'd have been issued a ticket. One day, if the possession of racist literature is criminalized, racial dissidents will be arrested at such random checks when the police see a copy of Mein Kampf on the back seat. Or maybe a swastika tattoo will be sufficient.

Do you remember the RICO laws? Those are the special laws that gave the U.S. Government extraordinary power to fight organized crime gangs, such as the mafia. That was how the government justified them in order to gain acceptance from the American people. The U.S. Government solemnly promised that the RICO laws would never be misused to suppress dissident voices or to make criminals of law-abiding people or to disrupt legal organizations by leveraging the misbehavior of a single member.

Trusting in the honor of the speakers of those promises, Americans accepted the RICO laws. But practically from the moment they became enforceable, the U.S. government started going after organizations and institutions whose activities were constitutionally protected, but unpopular. They were used, for example, against the publishers of erotic magazines, which were legal however many Americans might frown on the casual distribution of such material. The government knew that cracking down on pornography distributors would be popular, and that the popularity of the move would make a breech of the First Amendment possible.

The RICO actions against those publishers, however, were limited: far more thunder than lightning. The government (or rather the Jews who use the government as their tool) do not really care how much pornography may find its way into the hands of children. They only intended to establish, as a precedent, that the government must have the right to shut down organizations who publish "dangerous" materials, whether the alleged danger is from "obscenity" or from something else, such as promoting racism, exposing Jewish control of the media, or voicing disapproval of the U.S. government.

In 2002, the U.S. government, acting through the Justice Department, sent a paid stooge to set up Matt Hale for arrest. Matt Hale is the leader of a small religious group with pro-White racial views—among other things: they also have a set of dietary rules. Hale's church of Creativity, named for the superior creative capacities of the White race, was pro-White in the same sense that Zionism is pro-Jewish. If we were to assume that Whites and Jews have equal rights in America, then Creativity and Zionism would be equally abused by the U.S. government or, conversely, equally protected from abuse.

Of course, Whites built America and Jews did not—Jews merely leveraged a hostile takeover through media illusions, legal fictions and sundry appeals to White sentimentality. Jews are "guests" who by their bad behavior have worn out their welcome, but they have found the key to their hosts' gun closet and are at present smirkingly holding the door open and toying with the loaded weapons they've found. Morally, Whites have every right and every reason to kick all the Jews out of America, but as a practical matter the Jews have gained enormous political advantage through the gullibility of White voters and the race-treason of the officials that Whites were tricked into electing.

As the result, Matt Hale is being held in violation of his constitutional rights. He has been held absolutely incommunicado, under an "emergency national security" law that was originally intended to shield the United States from disaster in the event that a person intended to spread knowledge that could destroy the country (such as trigger a nuclear war). Matt Hale has no such knowledge. Matt Hale would not spread such knowledge even if he had it: it would get too many of his fellow Whites killed. But Attorney General John Ashcroft has invoked this law—illegally—to suppress a dissident religion and to silence its leader and spokesman.

When a government gets this bad, it's legitimacy is at an end. It might have lost its legitimacy for some other reason in the past, but, if it did not, then it has certainly lost it at this point. The U.S. government has taken to doing what its propagandists criticized the Soviet Union for doing with dissident writers. The underlying reason, of course, is the same: Jews were making the decisions in the USSR throughout its history, and, today, Jews are making the decisions for the U.S. government behind a paper-thin screen of gentile electees.

The words coming out of George W. Bush's mouth are, most of the time, crafted by a Jew named Paul Wolfowitz. George W. Bush would have been an ordinary White businessman had not Jewish neoconservatives and their hijacked Republican party drafted him into the presidency. George W. Bush, no statesman he, is a puppet on a Jewish hand, and this unfortunate circumstance has transformed him into one of the biggest traitors to the White race who has ever walked upon the Earth. In that regard, he has already surpassed Bill Clinton and is contending the title with Franklin Roosevelt.

Americans have had the opportunity to see at close range the way their government lies during a war. Blam! The missile killed Saddam. What's this? Saddam on TV talking about the missile attack? Blam! The Marines killed Saddam. Hey, isn't that Saddam Hussein over there? Blam, Saddam is killed during the invasion of Bagdhad. So where's the body?

Practically everything the U.S. government tells you about the Iraq war is a lie. The alleged reason for war, the alleged connections between Saddam and the 9/11 terrorist attacks, was pure fiction. The conduct of the war, as shown by American (i.e., Jewish) media propaganda, was almost entirely false. The demonization of Iraqis was ridiculous, and it's kind of pitiful that many Americans fell for it. When our government told us that the Iraqi ayatollah had instructed Iraqi Shiites not to oppose the U.S. invasion of his country, it was a lie. Even the American soldiers who went to Iraq were lied to: they were told that it would be easy, don't worry, the Iraqis will welcome them with open arms as liberators. The truth was something else.

And, perhaps above all, the primary historical smear against Iraq, namely that its government murdered the Kurds with poison gas in 1988, is a lie. The Kurds were killed with hydrogen cyanide during the Iran-Iraq war. Only Iran used cyanide gas. If Iraq had done the killing, the lethal agent would have been nerve gas. The Kurds were killed by Iran, not by Iraq. Saddam Hussein was falsely blamed for this crime by Jews and their captive politicians because the Jews wanted to smash Iraq's threat to Jewish control in the Middle East.

Of course, now that the lie has done its work, ZOG might suddenly "discover" the truth and use the Kurd massacre again as a pretext for war with Iran.

But it looks like Syria might be next on the Jews' list of countries for the US government to destroy. Syria has contended territory with Israel (e.g., the Golan Heights), and for their arrogance in defying the Holy Ones, Syria must pay. George Bush, limp puppet that he is, will find no backbone to resist the pressure of his Jewish advisors to present Syria with a long list of ridiculously presumptuous demands intended to provoke the Syrian defiance that will serve as the pretext to the next aggressive U.S. war.

Now the Middle East is one front that the Jews have gotten the U.S. government to fight on. Here at home, there is another. I have mentioned Matt Hale already. But there have been many other White Americans whose only real crimes are thought crimes. Here's a partial list. (I put it on a new page, so click the link.)

http://www.jabpage.org/posts/fedcops.html


Jerry's Posts Index Page
Jerry's Aryan Battle Page