Vending Machines of Corruption
Federal courts have degenerated to the point where they are little more than dispensers of advantage to politically favored groups. Highest among the favored groups are Jews and federal policemen. After that comes a tier of groups having second-rank favor: Blacks, Mestizo "Hispanics" and, as long as they have money to throw around, Amerinds.
The corruption is partly a matter of having lots of bribe money to grease the palms of lawyers and judges with, but only partly. The rest of it comes from a hostility toward White Americans that still too few White Americans have perceived, and which still fewer of them understand.
I've discussed on other pages the ages-long Jewish hatred of the Aryan peoples, and I've talked about why we can never, never trust the Jews no matter how fair a face they might present to us. So I'll pass over those subjects here.
When a federal cop shoots a small boy in the back, or murders a young woman carrying a baby in her arms, he goes into a federal court, inserts a special coin in the judge's mouth, and scoops up the favorable decision when it pops out on the floor.
For example, recall how federal judge Edward Lodge saved FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi from being tried by the people of Idaho for the murder of Vicki Weaver. Lodge said that the "supremacy clause" of the US constitution made Horiuchi immune to state prosecution. Now, imagine that you could go back in time and ask George Washington whether he intended the "supremacy clause" to shield federal agents from the consequences of any murders that they commit, and what sort of reply do you think you'd get?
Washington, draw your sword! Judge Lodge has betrayed your country worse than Benedict Arnold ever did.
When a major Jewish gangster wants relief from the guilt associated with him on account of his crimes, which can run from pedding snuff child pornography to swindling Americans out of several billion dollars in tax money, he goes into a federal court (or has someone else do it for him), inserts a special coin into the judge's mouth, and scoops up the favorable decision when it pops out on the floor.
Sometimes, though, he simply bribes or blackmails the President of the United States and gets his pardon that way. Remember Marc Rich?
Sometimes, if things actually go to the point where a Jew gets arrested, he makes bail the next day and, the day after, he's sunbathing on a beach near Haifa or Tel Aviv. Remember Arie Scher, Samuel Sheinbein, Seth Bekenstein...
If the arrestee is a Black, rather than a Jew, he will have to endure the trial, but as long as he didn't kill any Jews he might get off relatively easy. If he's a rich nigger, he might even squeak past the executioner even if a Jew was among his victims.
Have you caught the "real killers" yet, O.J.? It's been a while, you know.
A federal trial in cases where the defendant has money has a twofold purpose, rather than a singular one. First, it's a vacuum cleaning process by which the defendant is made to empty his wallet, his savings accounts, sell his shares in the stock market, auction off his house and other real properties, and offer up all the proceeds to his lawyers and the officers of the court. If these persons are sufficiently pleased by their gains, they will incline more favorably toward his case. Second, there's the usual corruption in regard to political correctness.
The "vending machine" process works in the other direction, too, but as usual only the favored groups get the special magic items required for making it work.
When someone belonging to a group known to hold "unapproved" religious beliefs or political opinions is falsely accused of a crime, or when it is a case of a mountain being made out of a mole hill and the defendant is being tried for the mountain—e.g., the legal action against the Aryan Nations, the felony charge against Lonny Rae—then a Jew (or someone of high political "rank") can walk into the trial, pop a special suppository into...okay, nevermind the graphics...and watch as the judge vomits forth the desired decision, regardless of how much law or precedent he must set aside in order to do so.
Something of this sort happened to Hendrick Moebus, who was deported by the United States to Germany for making statements that are protected in the United States as "free speech," but which are contrary to speech-restrictions in Germany. The Jewsmedia, at the time, told a great many lies about the deportation having something to do with a warrant for murder, an old crime in which Moebus had been involved, but of which he was not the perpetrator, and anyway had already served all the required jail time. The media reached into the past to bring up a non-issue that they used to cloud the real issue: the US government entered into a conspiracy with the German government to deny a person his rights under US law.
And the federal courts played right along. The Jews had applied their "medicines" on the judge, and the judge vomited forth the decision expected of him. That it was an unjust decision, he knew fully well. That he was setting aside established law in order to comply with the Jews' wishes, he knew fully well. But he did it anyway, and so Mr. Moebus was denied political asylum in the United States and had to go back to prison in Germany for doing what the US constitution declares to be anyone's fundamental right.
When Jews are guilty of the foulest crimes, they flee to Israel and are safe.
When Whites are guilty of no real crime, but rather of merely offending the Jews in a way for which the Jews can contrive a prosecution as a reprisal, there is no "Israel" to which the White may go to avoid Jewish persecution. Ergo, when a Jew whines about being persecuted, the only proper response by gentiles is derisive laughter.
Hiya, judge. Sieg heil.